Finding Resultant Force on Beam: F1 & F2

  • Thread starter Thread starter Ry122
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Beam Moment
Ry122
Messages
563
Reaction score
2
http://users.on.net/~rohanlal/Q16.jpg
Is the magnitude of the single resultant force found by finding the y components of the forces that are acting on the beam then subtracting them from each other? Is the horizontal component of F1 ignored?

Also, the line of action of F1 is supposed to be 1.384M. How is this value determined?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Ry122 said:
Is the magnitude of the single resultant force found by finding the y components of the forces that are acting on the beam then subtracting them from each other? Is the horizontal component of F1 ignored?

Also, the line of action of F1 is supposed to be 1.384M. How is this value determined?
The force, F1, acts on the beam at a distance/displacement 0.2 m from the axis passing through O. Draw a line parallel and through F1, and determine how far from O that line through F1 intersects the axis.
 
Could you also tell me if my method of finding the resultant force is correct? thanks
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top