Finding the acceleration of gravity given 2 masses

AI Thread Summary
To find the acceleration of gravity using two hanging masses on a pulley, the equation m1(g + a) = m2(g - a) is utilized. The user initially struggles to isolate g after substituting weights into the equation. Guidance is provided to expand both sides of the equation and rearrange terms to gather all g-related components on one side. It is emphasized that maintaining the correct signs during this process is crucial. Ultimately, factoring out g allows for its isolation and calculation, leading to the expected result of 9.7 m/s².
jg871
Messages
17
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


We are given 2 hanging masses on opposite sides of a pully. masses and distance traveled in the time are given. We are required to find the acceleration of gravity

Homework Equations


m1 (g+a)=m2 (g-a)

The Attempt at a Solution


I found acceleration and have now changed weights w1 and w2 equal to m1g+m1a and m2g-m2a. I am having trouble solving for g. Could I get some help on how I do this? The answer is 9.7m/s^2 but do not know how to isolate g.
[/B]
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Where did that equation come from?
 
BiGyElLoWhAt said:
Where did that equation come from?
I'm not entirely certain where the instructor whipped it out but This is what equations have came up with the problem thus far:
T(tension)-w1=m1a which can be turned to T=m1a+w1 which can be turned to T=m1a+m1g. This would be the same case for w2-T=m2a. Then the equation m1g+m1a=m2g+m2a was written down and we were told we could find g from there
 
Your Relevant equation is fine. It seems that you're having an algebra problem, not a physics problem :smile:

Why not start by expanding both sides of your m1 (g+a)=m2 (g-a) expression, then gather all the terms containing g on one side and the rest on the other side of the equal sign?
 
m1g-m2g=m2a-m1a? Would I then factor out the g?
 
jg871 said:
m1g-m2g=m2a-m1a? Would I then factor out the g?
You've lost the sign of the m2a term on the right hand side. It didn't change sides, so it must retain its original sign.

Yes, you then factor out the g and isolate it.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...

Similar threads

Back
Top