Finding the Distance for Static Equilibrium of a Suspended Rod

AI Thread Summary
To achieve static equilibrium for a suspended rod with two masses, the torque from each mass must balance. The uniform rod's mass affects the torque calculation, as it can be treated as concentrated at its midpoint. The correct distance for placing the 0.20 kg mass is found to be approximately 0.503 meters from the pivot point. The mass of the rod is significant, as it contributes to the overall torque and must be included in the calculations. Understanding these principles clarifies the dynamics of static equilibrium in this scenario.
flash2
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
A uniform .122kg rod of .90 m length is used to suspend two masses as shown below. At what distance x should the .20kg mass be place to achieve static equilibrium?

physics_torque2.jpg



Okay so I got the Torque of the 0.2kg mass

T= (0.2)(9.8)(x) with x being the length I hafta find.

Then I got the Torque of the 0.50kg mass

T= (0.5)(9.8)(0.2)

Then I plugged it into this...

sum of Torques CW= Sum of Torques CCW and the answer was 0.5m and I got that but originally for the 0.50 mass, I put in (0.25) for the length because that's what it is but I didn't get teh answer so I did trial and error with the numbers I had and I figured 0.2m was the right length to get the right answer. So I'm wondering why it's 0.2 m and if the mass of the rod matters.. cause I dind't use it.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Well the answer I'm arriving at is .503 meters, or just .5 if you want to keep it simple. When they give you mass of the rod, that usually means it matters, and they make it simple when they tell you it's uniform. Since the mass-density is uniform you can assume that the rod applies all it's weight as though it were concentrated at the length of the rod divided by two, or .45. Since .45 is to the left of the support point, you can say the rod applies a torque of (.122*9.81*.2)

So the equation becomes (.2*9.81*x) + (.122*9.81*.2) = (.5*9.81*.25)
Solving for x yields .986886/(.2*9.81) = .503

When we plug this value into our original summation of torques equation we arrive at 1.22625 = 1.22625 so the bar must now be in static equilibrium.
 
The mass of the bar matters because even without the weights the bar will tilt in the direction of the longer side.
 
Oh man I get it so much more now. So is there a torque from the rod exerted on the right side of the balance too? Or does taht even matter?

I know this is prbly really easy but it's extremely hard when your teacher doesn't teach the lesson.

Thanks!

-f
 
flash2 said:
Oh man I get it so much more now. So is there a torque from the rod exerted on the right side of the balance too? Or does taht even matter?

I know this is prbly really easy but it's extremely hard when your teacher doesn't teach the lesson.

Thanks!

-f
You only need on torque from the rod. You may take all the mass of the rod as if it were located at the center of the rod (assuming the rod has uniform density).
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top