Finding the Electric field at the Origin

AI Thread Summary
To find the electric field at the origin due to a quarter ring of charge, the x-components of the electric field cancel out due to symmetry, leaving only the y-component. The user is struggling with the limits of integration, initially using 3π/4 to π/4, which did not yield an exact zero for the x-component. It is suggested that the limits should be reversed to π/4 to 3π/4 to ensure the x-component integrates to zero. Additionally, there is a reminder to check that the calculator is in radian mode for accurate evaluations. Correct limits of integration are crucial for determining the accurate electric field components.
NkaujHelp
Messages
16
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


I'm trying to find the electric field at the origin <0, 0, 0> due to a quarter of a ring with +Q charges on it. The quarter of the ring lies on the +y-axis. Due to symmetry, the x-components of the electric field will cancel out, leaving only the y-component of the electric field pointing in the negative y-direction. So my problem with this is finding the correct limit of integration to use for this problem. At first, I used the limits of integration from 3pi/4 to pi/4. When I used this on the x-component, it didn't give me an exact 0. It gave me like 0.2738 something like that. The answer for the x-components should have been exactly zero. So I don't know if this was the right limits of integration or is there other limits that I can use that I can't think of to make the x-components zero. If my limits of integration that I use doesn't make the x-components zero, then my answer for the electric field for the y-component would be wrong too. I know how to do everything else, but it's the limits that I am stuck on.

Homework Equations


E = [(kΔq)/(πr^2)] * r hat
r hat = <-cosσ, -sinσ, 0>
Δq = (2(+Q)Δσ)/π

The Attempt at a Solution


Integrating for the x-component: ∫[2k(+Q)(-cosσdσ)]/[πR^2] = 2k(+Q)/πR^2 ∫-cosσdσ
 
Physics news on Phys.org
NkaujHelp said:

Homework Equations


E = [(kΔq)/(πr^2)] * r hat
r hat = <-cosσ, -sinσ, 0>
Δq = (2(+Q)Δσ)/π
OK, except I think you have a typo in the expression for E. Should there be ##\pi## in the denominator?

The Attempt at a Solution


Integrating for the x-component: ∫[2k(+Q)(-cosσdσ)]/[πR^2] = 2k(+Q)/πR^2 ∫-cosσdσ
This looks correct. (Now there should be the factor of ##\pi## as you have it.)

I used the limits of integration from 3pi/4 to pi/4.
Why "from 3pi/4 to pi/4" rather than "from pi/4 to 3pi/4"?

Your integral should give exactly zero. Don't forget to put your calculator in radian mode if you are using your calculator to evaluate something like ##\sin(\pi/4)## (which you probably know without needing a calculator).
 
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanged mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top