Archived Finding the electric field between two lines of charges using Gauss Law

AI Thread Summary
To find the electric field between two parallel lines of charge using Gauss's Law, a cylindrical Gaussian surface is chosen around the lines. The electric field for one line is derived as E = λ/(2πrε₀), where λ is the charge per unit length and r is the distance from the line. The total electric field at a point between the lines is the sum of the fields from both lines, which are in the same direction. The net electric field is expressed as ∑E = λ+/2πε₀r + λ-/2πε₀r, using the absolute values of the charge densities. The distances from the lines to the point of interest must be considered to accurately calculate the electric field.
Jazita
Messages
1
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


The problem is given in the attachment below

Homework Equations



(i)EA= Q/epsilon naught

(ii)Area of cylinder used = 2pi*r*L

(iii)The integral of E*dA =Q/4pi*epsilon naught

(iv) Llamda= Q/L

The Attempt at a Solution


Well I know I needed to choose a suitable Gaussian surface which is a cylinder around the two lines of charges. Using Gauss' Law I get the first equation above using the third equation. I know that I have to take the 1st equation and transpose the Area across. I end up with E=llamda/(2*pi*r*epsilon naught). That is the electric field for one of the lines of charge. I'm not sure how to get the second line of charge involved nor to include the distance, D into the equation. (I'm sure it does play a role in the equation but I'm not sure how)Oh. I got the answer for the 2nd part of the question using the formula E=llamda/(2*pi*D*epsilon naught) but when I placed it in the equation section, it was wrong.
 

Attachments

  • saling.JPG
    saling.JPG
    46.1 KB · Views: 1,157
Physics news on Phys.org
This is a Gauss's law problem.

First, let's place the two lines of charge on an x-y coordinate: we'll place the positive line on the x-axis and the negative line parallel to the x-axis a height D along the y axis.

Second, let's draw the directions of the electric fields of the lines at the point of interest (halfway in between the lines, D/2). The direction of the electric field of the positive line (E+) at this point is up as is the direction of the electric field of the negative line (E-). The electric fields are in the same direction at this point so the net field is their sum.

Third, how can we calculate the electric field of an infinite line? The result can be obtained from any text, and is E = λ/2πε0r, where r = the distance from the line charge to the point where we're trying to find the magnitude of the electric field.

Fourth, let's see how we can derive this equation ourselves. Gauss's law: = EA = Q/ε0. Solving for E gives E = Q/Aε0. The Guassian surface that is symmetrical about an infinite line charge is a cylinder which has a surface area A = 2πrl so E = Q/2πrlε0 but Q/l = λ giving us E = λ/2πε0r. The ends of the cylinder, with area A = πr^2, are not included since their surfaces are parallel to the electric field of the line charge so they have zero electric flux.

Fifth, finding the net electric field. As positioned in our x-y coordinate system both electric fields are up which we generally take to be positive. Let's find the sum of the electric fields. ∑Ey = E+ + E- = λ+/2πε0r + λ-/2πε0r where λ+ = the absolute value of the positive line and λ- = is the absolute value of the negative line. We only use the absolute values because we've already taken into account the directions of the electric fields of the lines in our analysis. One final note, if the distances between the lines and the point of interest are not different then the two electric fields will have different values of r. Thank you.

Alex Duron
foundations-tutoring.com
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top