Finding the final temperature of mixed ice and steam

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the final temperature of a mixture of steam and ice. Participants clarify that the final state cannot be solely water, as both steam and ice coexist at 100°C. The heat exchange calculations indicate that some steam must condense to provide enough energy for the ice to reach 100°C. A specific calculation shows that approximately 9.23 grams of steam must condense to release the necessary energy. The importance of rounding results to the correct number of significant figures is also emphasized.
kiro484
Messages
21
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Suppose that 20.0g of steam at 110°C is mixed with 25.0g of ice at -40°C What will the final temperature be?

Ice - Specific heat capacity 2.10 J/g°C
Water - Specific heat capacity 4.19 J/g°C
Water - Latent heat of fusion 334 J/g
Water - Latent heat of vaporization 2268 J/g
Steam - Specific heat capacity 2.08 J/g°C


Homework Equations


Q=mcΔt
Q=mH

The Attempt at a Solution


Heat loss (steam) = Heat gain (ice)
mcΔt+mH+mcΔt = mcΔt+mH+mcΔt
(20g)(2.08J/g°C)(10°C)+(20g)(2268J/g)+(20g)(4.19J/g°C)(100-t) = (25g)(2.1T/g°C)(40°C)+(25g)(334J/g)+(25g)(4.19J/g°C)(t-0)
416J+45360J+83.8J/°C(100-t) = 2100J+8350J+104.75J/°C(t-0)
Combining like terms
45776J+83.8J/°C(100-t) = 10450J + 104.75J/°C(t-0)
35326J+83.8J/°C(100-t) = 104.75J/°C(t-0)
35326J+8380J/°C-83.8J/°Ct = 104.75J/°Ct
35326J+8380J/°C = 188.55J/°Ct
187.356139(1/°C)+44.444444444444444444444444444444 = t
231.8005834°C = t
232°C = t

Any help would be greatly appreciated, thanks in advance.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Last edited by a moderator:
It ends in 2 different states. But I don't know how to show any of the work needed to show this. Am I supposed to say that only (for example, not the actual values) that only 15g of steam condenses? What about the other 5g? Does it stay at 110 degrees? It can't do that because then you have 2 different temperatures. This is what I don't understand, and I've asked many times hoping more people will be able to help me.
 
I wrote in your other thread that
The ice can not condense all steam. Steam and water coexist at the boiling point of water.
Do you understand what it means? ehild
 
Ok so that means they both have to be at 100 degrees. All the steam cooling to that temperature releases 416J of heat. The ice needs 21344J to reach 100 degrees. Where would the rest of this energy come from? Some of the steam condensing? How much of the steam would be needed to provide that heat?
 
kiro484 said:
Ok so that means they both have to be at 100 degrees. All the steam cooling to that temperature releases 416J of heat. The ice needs 21344J to reach 100 degrees. Where would the rest of this energy come from? Some of the steam condensing? How much of the steam would be needed to provide that heat?

It is some steam condensing. So use t=100 in your equation, but when multiplying the latent heat of evaporation with the mass x instead of 20 g.

ehild
 
Could I do this? This is using the values of ice needing 21344J to reach 100 degrees and steam releasing 416J when becoming 100 degrees.
21344-416=20928J needed to get all the ice to 100 degrees.
Q=mH
m=Q/H
m=20928J/2268J/g
m=9.22751323g
So that is the mass of steam needed to condense to release the rest of the energy needed to bring the ice up to 100 degrees.
 
Last edited:
kiro484 said:
Could I do this? This is using the values of ice needing 21344J to reach 100 degrees and steam releasing 416J when becoming 100 degrees.
21344-416=20928J needed to get all the ice to 100 degrees.
Q=mH
m=Q/H
m=20928J/2268J/g
m=9.22751323g
So that is the mass of steam needed to condense to release the rest of the energy needed to bring the ice up to 100 degrees.

Yes, you can do it.

Do not use so many digits in the end result. ehild
 
Yeah you have to round off to the amount of significant digits of the original values given in the question, correct?
 
  • #10
kiro484 said:
Yeah you have to round off to the amount of significant digits of the original values given in the question, correct?

Yes. To three digits.

ehild
 
  • #11
Ok thank you so so much for all the help. Sorry for creating a billion threads trying to find more help, yours is all I needed.
 
Back
Top