Finding Unit Vectors for Angle of pi/3 in R3

AI Thread Summary
To find unit vectors in R3 that form an angle of pi/3 with the vectors (1,0,-1) and (0,1,1), the dot product is used to establish the necessary equations. The angle between the given vectors is confirmed to be pi/3, leading to the conclusion that the unit vectors must also maintain this angle. The solution involves setting up three equations based on the constraints of being a unit vector and the specified angles. The correct unit vector that satisfies these conditions is identified as (1/sqrt(2), 1/sqrt(2), 0). The discussion emphasizes translating the problem's restrictions into algebraic equations for resolution.
gunnar
Messages
39
Reaction score
0
There are two vectors (1,0,-1) and (0,1,1)
I need to find all the unit vectors x in R3 that make an angle of pi/3 with each of the vectors above.

Can someone please help with this problem?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
hint:
use dot product to find the angle between vectors
 
You should be able to use the three constraints on your solution vector (unit vector, specified angle with a vector, specified angle with another vector) to write down three equations in the components of your solution vector. Then, solve.
 
O.K I figured out that the angle between the given vectors is 60 degrees or pi/3

The angle between the unit vectors and each of the given vectors is supposed to be pi/3 also. So I used the dot product to calculate

c=sqrt(2) since the unitvector has length 1 and both the given vectors have the length sqrt(2)

Don't seem to be able to get the right answear.
The correct answear is (1/sqrt(2), 1/sqrt(2), 0) only one vector.

How to reach that conclusion I have no idea
 
Lets call the components of the vector you seek (a,b,c). Now there are three restriction on these three numbers. So when you write down the tree restrictions Hurkyl gave in terms of a,b and c you have three equations with three unknowns which you can solve. Can you translate the restrictions from words to algebra?
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top