Finding voltage from the E field

  • Thread starter Thread starter iScience
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Field Voltage
AI Thread Summary
To find the voltage at point P due to a linear charge density along the x-axis, the proposed integration of electric field components in both x and z directions is questioned. The discussion emphasizes that the integration bounds must be clearly defined, and the assumptions about the electric field's behavior at infinity are crucial. It is suggested that the potential can be derived directly by integrating contributions from small charge elements along the line charge. The conversation highlights the importance of having a complete expression for the electric field and clarifies that the integration should focus on the potential rather than the electric field components. Understanding the relationship between charge density, distance, and potential is essential for solving the problem accurately.
iScience
Messages
466
Reaction score
5
consider..

Rg3UGT0.png


If I'm trying to find the voltage at point P due to a linear charge density of length L (the white line that lies on the x axis):

then how come it is incorrect to do the following?

$$V=\int{\vec{E_{x}}dx}+\int{\vec{E_{z}}dz}$$?

(the r vector is just to find dE at each point on the charge density of length L)
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Hello I,

What exactly does your equation mean ? Ex ? Ez ? what is dx, dz and what are the integration bounds ?

Also: is your endering of the exercise complete ? r ?
 
$$\vec{E_{x}}$$ and $$\vec{E_{z}}$$ are the electric field vectors in the specified directions, x, and z respectively.

I'm not concerned with specific bounds at this time right now i am only concerned with whether or not i have the right expression for potential at some point in space i decided to call "P".

Also: is your endering of the exercise complete ?

i don't know what you mean

r?

"(the r vector is just to find dE at each point on the charge density of length L)"
 
You want to find the potential at point P due to the line charge on the x-axis.

If you already, at all points in space, know the electric field, cause by the line charge, then you can integrate, e.g. Ez dz from z =∞ to z = z(P) to get V.

Or Ex dx from x =-∞, z = z(P) to x = 0, z = z(P)

These two under the assumption that V = 0 far away from the wire (which x = ∞, z = z(P) does not satisfy).

They look like your integrals, only one has dx = 0 and the other dz = 0 (makes life easier).

---

My question about the Rendering (sorry) of the original problem was inspired by the fact that I am missing an indication of what z is, what r is, whether the charge density on the line is a constant, ...

---

Since you don't work out your integrals, I am inclined to believe you do not have an expression for ##\vec E(x,z)## for all ##x,z##. You could embark on finding one, but the exercise only asks for the potential.

I take it you do have an expression for V as a function of q and r at hand. So if you chop your line charge into little pieces with length dx, each little piece having a charge ##dq = \lambda dx## and contributing a little ##dV = ... dq = ... dx##, I am sure you can easily write down an integral that finds you V diectly!
 
Thread 'Variable mass system : water sprayed into a moving container'
Starting with the mass considerations #m(t)# is mass of water #M_{c}# mass of container and #M(t)# mass of total system $$M(t) = M_{C} + m(t)$$ $$\Rightarrow \frac{dM(t)}{dt} = \frac{dm(t)}{dt}$$ $$P_i = Mv + u \, dm$$ $$P_f = (M + dm)(v + dv)$$ $$\Delta P = M \, dv + (v - u) \, dm$$ $$F = \frac{dP}{dt} = M \frac{dv}{dt} + (v - u) \frac{dm}{dt}$$ $$F = u \frac{dm}{dt} = \rho A u^2$$ from conservation of momentum , the cannon recoils with the same force which it applies. $$\quad \frac{dm}{dt}...
Back
Top