First order coherence classical optics problem

Azelketh
Messages
38
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Hi, I am trying to work through exercise 2.1 on page 37 of Microcavities (by alexy kavokin, jeremy baumberg, guillaume malpuech and fabrice laussy)


the problem is to prove
<br /> | g^{(1)}(\tau) | = | cos( \frac{1}{2}(\omega_1 - \omega_2)\tau) ) |<br />


where:

<br /> g^{(1)}(\tau)=\frac{\langle E^{\ast}(t)E(t+\tau)\rangle}{\langle |E(t)|^2 \rangle}<br />
and
<br /> E(t)=E_0(t)\exp^{i[k_1z-\omega_1t]}+E_0(t)\exp^{i[k_2z-\omega_2t+\varphi]}<br />
where
<br /> \varphi varies randomly between measurements


how do you deal mathmatically with \varphi varying??


Also more simply above the exercise the text states a simpler apparently 'trivial' result using the same formula for g^{(1)}(\tau) that the sine wave of
<br /> E(t)=E_0(t)\exp^{i[\omega t - kz + \varphi]}<br />
by direct application of the formula for g^{(1)}(\tau) yields:

<br /> g^{(1)}(\tau)= \exp^{i\omega \tau}<br />

i cannot show even this 'trivial' application, i find that:
<br /> \langle E^{\ast}(t)E(t+\tau)\rangle = \langle E_0\exp^{-i\omega \tau}\rangle <br />
and
<br /> \langle |E(t)|^2 \rangle = \langle |E_0^2 \exp^{2i(\omega t -kx + \varphi)} \rangle<br />
How does that evaluate to
<br /> g^{(1)}(\tau)= \exp^{-i\omega \tau}<br /> ??
If anyone can give me any pointers( or show me the complete workings of this XD ) then it would much appreciated. Thanks for reading my post.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
problem no longer. Just assumed by /varphi varying randomly then all components with /varphi cancel in the averageing.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top