Flux of electric field through the square

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the electric flux through a square surface in the xy-plane due to a charged particle located above it. The charge is given as q = 8.85 μC, and the flux is analyzed for different heights, specifically when h = 0.05 L. The initial confusion regarding the nature of the surface is clarified, leading to the realization that integration of the electric field over the surface is necessary. A solid angle approach is employed to simplify the calculation, ultimately yielding the correct answer without needing complex integrals. The importance of solid angles in applying Gauss's law is highlighted in the solution process.
leventa2
Messages
7
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A small particle, with charge q = 8.85 μC, is located at (x,y,z) = (0,0,h). Calculate the flux of electric field through the square in the xy-plane, of size L × L, centered at the origin.

(B) What is the flux if h = 0.05 L?

Homework Equations



Flux=Charge/permittivity (in a closed surface)

The Attempt at a Solution



If h = 0.5 L, then I would just divide the flux by six. But I don't know where to go from here...
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Contemplate the relevant equation you provided!
 
but how should I contemplate it? The surface is an open surface, and the flux is asymmetrical.
 
leventa2 said:
but how should I contemplate it? The surface is an open surface, and the flux is asymmetrical.

Ah, sorry. I jumped to the (incorrect) assumption that it was a square box, not just a square surface.

I suppose you'll have to integrate E.dS over the surface to determine the total flux.
 
Actually, I just solved it no integral necessary :D. Basically, I imagined the surface as part of a cube, and the cube surrounded by a sphere. Connecting the four corners of the surface to the electron in the center creates a square pyramid with base length L X L and height 0.05 L. I used the formula 4*arcsin((a^2)/(a^2+4*h^2)) to find the solid angle, and divided it by 4pi, the total solid angle. I multplied the resulting value by the total flux of the cube. It seems that solid angles play an important part in Gauss's law.

This was all tiring, but totally worth it when I got the correct answer.
 
Nicely done.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top