Flux through a paraboloid? The Divergence Theorem and Integration Error

  • Thread starter Thread starter Raen
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Flux Paraboloid
Raen
Messages
11
Reaction score
0
The Problem: I have a paraboloid open along the positive z-axis, starting at the origin and ending at z = 100. At z=100, the horizontal surface is a circle with a radius of 20. Water is flowing through the paraboloid with the velocity F = 2xzi - (1100 + xe^-x^2)j + z(1100 - z)k. I'm asked to find the flux through the paraboloid using the divergence theorem.


Equations: divF = dF1/dx + dF2/dy + dF3/dz
Flux = \int divF dV



My attempt: I started by finding the divergence.

2z + 0 + (1100 - 2z) = 1100

Next, I found the equation for the paraboloid.

z = r^2/x
100 = 20^2/x
100 = 400/4
z = r^2/4

Then I iterated the integral.

Flux = \int^{2\pi}_{0} \int^{20}_{0} \int^{100}_{r^2/4} 1100r dz dr d\theta

When I solve the integral, I end up with -11000000pi, but the answer is supposed to be 10000pi. Where am I going wrong?

If I have it correct thus far and my problem is in my integration, please let me know and I'll type out the integration step by step, as well. Thank you!
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi Raen! :smile:

(try using the X2 icon just above the Reply box :wink:)
Raen said:
The Problem: I have a paraboloid open along the positive z-axis, …

(i haven't checked your figures, but …)

The paraboloid is open, so you'll need to subtract the flux through the open end. :wink:
 
The flux through the top is positive, so subtracting the flux through the open circle from what I already had gives me an even larger negative number, -51000000pi.
 
oooh, I didn't notice that minus sign! :redface:

but how did you manage to get a negative result from integrating something that's everywhere positive? :confused:
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top