Flux through an infinite plane due to a point charge

AI Thread Summary
To determine the electric flux through an infinite plane due to a point charge located a distance d from it, the total flux through an enclosing cuboid is calculated as q/ε₀. The flux through the two infinite planes opposite the charge is negligible because the electric field approaches zero at infinity. Consequently, the flux through one infinite plane is derived to be q/(2ε₀). The key point is that the electric field's influence diminishes with distance, leading to this conclusion. Understanding the behavior of electric fields at infinity is crucial for accurate calculations.
Pushoam
Messages
961
Reaction score
53

Homework Statement


A point charge q is located a distance d meters from an infinite plane. Determine the electric flux through the plane due to the point charge.
[/B]

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution


I consider another infinite plane at a distance d in the opposite direction. Now I have infinite cuboid.

The flux through all the surfaces of the cuboid is ## \frac {q } { \epsilon _0} ##.

Since the plane with length d is smaller than the other two planes, the flux through these two planes is negligible in comparison with that due to the other two infinite planes. The other two infinite planes have equal flux. So, the flux through one infinite plane is ## \frac {q } { 2 \epsilon _0} ##.

Is this correct?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Not quite right. It is not because the size is negligible but the electric field is zero at infinity.
 
  • Like
Likes Pushoam
Yes, the other two surfaces are at an infinite distance from the charge, so the electric field is negligible and hence the flux. Thanks for pointing it out.
 
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Thread 'Variable mass system : water sprayed into a moving container'
Starting with the mass considerations #m(t)# is mass of water #M_{c}# mass of container and #M(t)# mass of total system $$M(t) = M_{C} + m(t)$$ $$\Rightarrow \frac{dM(t)}{dt} = \frac{dm(t)}{dt}$$ $$P_i = Mv + u \, dm$$ $$P_f = (M + dm)(v + dv)$$ $$\Delta P = M \, dv + (v - u) \, dm$$ $$F = \frac{dP}{dt} = M \frac{dv}{dt} + (v - u) \frac{dm}{dt}$$ $$F = u \frac{dm}{dt} = \rho A u^2$$ from conservation of momentum , the cannon recoils with the same force which it applies. $$\quad \frac{dm}{dt}...
Back
Top