Forbidden Gamma --> e+e-: Show Conservation Violation

  • Thread starter Thread starter quasar_4
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Conservation
quasar_4
Messages
273
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Show that although gamma rays can have energies greater than the energy of a e+e- pair at rest, the process gamma --> e+e- is forbidden.

Homework Equations



Noether's theorem

The Attempt at a Solution



I know that to show that the process is forbidden, I should be able to show that it violates a conservation principle. But I'm not at all sure what formalism to use for the problem. Can someone give me a nudge in the right direction?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Energy may conserved in this process but what other major conserved quantities do we have? HINT: The one that isn't conserved here, you learned about in introductory physics. Remember, the resulting particles are at rest.
 
Ok, so it turns out that I was misreading the problem. All that I need to do (if I am now reading correctly, lol) is to prove that pair production can't occur in empty space! That's not bad at all; the requirements of energy conservation demand that another nucleus be present to absorb some of the photon's linear momentum (without another nucleus, conservation of linear momentum is violated). It's a quick proof. Thanks for the help. Sometimes I just need to actually read my problems more carefully...
 
Hi, I had an exam and I completely messed up a problem. Especially one part which was necessary for the rest of the problem. Basically, I have a wormhole metric: $$(ds)^2 = -(dt)^2 + (dr)^2 + (r^2 + b^2)( (d\theta)^2 + sin^2 \theta (d\phi)^2 )$$ Where ##b=1## with an orbit only in the equatorial plane. We also know from the question that the orbit must satisfy this relationship: $$\varepsilon = \frac{1}{2} (\frac{dr}{d\tau})^2 + V_{eff}(r)$$ Ultimately, I was tasked to find the initial...
The value of H equals ## 10^{3}## in natural units, According to : https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Natural_units, ## t \sim 10^{-21} sec = 10^{21} Hz ##, and since ## \text{GeV} \sim 10^{24} \text{Hz } ##, ## GeV \sim 10^{24} \times 10^{-21} = 10^3 ## in natural units. So is this conversion correct? Also in the above formula, can I convert H to that natural units , since it’s a constant, while keeping k in Hz ?
Back
Top