I Force on a rod attached to a pivot

  • I
  • Thread starter Thread starter albertrichardf
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Force Pivot Rod
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on calculating the horizontal force on a pivot attached to a rod with a weight, referencing Feynman's physics principles. The user initially calculates the horizontal force as 9.4 N using trigonometric components of the weight, while Feynman suggests it should be 14.7 N, leading to confusion. The user seeks clarification on the discrepancy and questions the source of the horizontal force if the rod only experiences a vertical force from the weight. The conversation emphasizes understanding the relationship between vertical and horizontal forces in the context of the rod's mechanics. The inquiry aims to resolve the differences in calculations and clarify the underlying physics principles.
albertrichardf
Messages
165
Reaction score
11
Hello.
Can anyone help me confirm the following from the Feynman tips on physics:
View attachment 111741
The above diagram shows two rods, with a weight attached (the square). Each rod has a pivot attached, though the pivot on the left is fixed and cannot roll. The weight is 2 kg, and the rod is 0.5 m long. The question is to find the horizontal force on the right pivot when the weight is 0.4 m from the ground. Both rods exert a force such that the net vertical component balances the weight but for the following pretend that the rod with the moving pivot bears all the weight.

My reasoning is as follows: the weight exerts a vertical force on the rod. Part of this force is parallel to the rod and part is perpendicular. The rod transfers any parallel force to the pivot, and rotates under the effect of the perpendicular force. For our purposes, the perpendicular force can be ignored. The vertical component of the parallel force can also be ignored because that is balanced by the ground. The horizontal component of the parallel force is thus what is being looked for.

The parallel component is W cos ø, where W is the weight of the mass (2 * 9.8) and ø is the angle. The horizontal component is W cos ø sin ø. All this comes from trigonometry. Therefore the total horizontal force is about 9.4 N.However, Feynman reasons that the net force must be parallel to the rod. Because of the weight pushing onto the rod, the rod feels a vertical force, which it exerts on the pivot. The horizontal force on the pivot is also felt by the rod and must be such that the net force is directed parallel to the rod. In other words, the vertical and horizontal forces form right triangle with the net force as the hypotenuse. The horizontal force is then
W tan ø = 14.7

So I got 9.4 but he got 14.7. Can someone explain to me why I am wrong? Also in his explanation, if the rod feels only a vertical force due to the weight, where does the horizontal force on the pivot come from?

Thanks for answering
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Thread 'Question about pressure of a liquid'
I am looking at pressure in liquids and I am testing my idea. The vertical tube is 100m, the contraption is filled with water. The vertical tube is very thin(maybe 1mm^2 cross section). The area of the base is ~100m^2. Will he top half be launched in the air if suddenly it cracked?- assuming its light enough. I want to test my idea that if I had a thin long ruber tube that I lifted up, then the pressure at "red lines" will be high and that the $force = pressure * area$ would be massive...
I feel it should be solvable we just need to find a perfect pattern, and there will be a general pattern since the forces acting are based on a single function, so..... you can't actually say it is unsolvable right? Cause imaging 3 bodies actually existed somwhere in this universe then nature isn't gonna wait till we predict it! And yea I have checked in many places that tiny changes cause large changes so it becomes chaos........ but still I just can't accept that it is impossible to solve...
Back
Top