Forces acting on two blocks stacked one on another

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around the forces acting on two blocks, m1 and m2, where m1 is on top of m2, which is on a frictionless surface. A constant horizontal force F is applied to m1, causing both blocks to move. Key points include the importance of calculating the normal forces and friction forces correctly, particularly how the normal force on m1 is influenced by the weight of m1 and the normal force from m2. The participants clarify that for block m2, the friction force from m1 acts as a reaction force, and they emphasize the need to differentiate between the accelerations of the two blocks. Ultimately, the discussion highlights the relationship between the forces and accelerations in a system where one block is significantly heavier than the other.
Siracuse
Messages
23
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


I'll describe this without the numbers, values and such. The issue here is to understand the logic worked on this problem...well any problem is like that. Anyhow, this is the situation:

A block of mass m1 is stacked on the surface of another block of mass m2 of width L, where m2>>m1. There is kinetic friction between those two blocks, static friction coefficient is not given. Block m2 is on a frictionless surface. An horizontal, constant force F is applied on block m1. The whole system of blocks moves.

Homework Equations



Sum of forces in x,y components;

The Attempt at a Solution



First thing: since there is a friction force, calculating the normal force in this case is important. For block m1,

Fn_m1 - Fg_m1 + Fn_m2 = 0 -> Fn_m1 = Fg_m1 - F_m2;

For block m2,

Fn_m2 - Fg_m1 - Fg_m2 = 0 -> Fn_m2 = Fg_m1 + Fg_m2;

The rest should just involve basic algebra, to obtain Fn_m1 and, therefore, the value of the kinetic friction force.

Now, to work on the second part, the x-axis. Block m1:

F - F_kin = m.a

For block m2...here's where I think I don't know what I am doing. The picture of my Halliday book shows block m2 moving, so what kind of forces are acting on m2 in the x-axis? Is there a resulting force derived from the friction between the blocks? I've thought about this for a while and I'm just clueless. Not even sure if my logic for the forces on the y-axis is correct...
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Siracuse said:

Homework Statement


I'll describe this without the numbers, values and such. The issue here is to understand the logic worked on this problem...well any problem is like that. Anyhow, this is the situation:

A block of mass m1 is stacked on the surface of another block of mass m2 of width L, where m2>>m1. There is kinetic friction between those two blocks, static friction coefficient is not given. Block m2 is on a frictionless surface. An horizontal, constant force F is applied on block m1. The whole system of blocks moves.


Homework Equations



Sum of forces in x,y components;

The Attempt at a Solution



First thing: since there is a friction force, calculating the normal force in this case is important. For block m1,

Fn_m1 - Fg_m1 + Fn_m2 = 0 -> Fn_m1 = Fg_m1 - F_m2;
no, when you look at the forces acting on m1 inthe vertical direction, using a free body diagram, there are 2 forces acting: its weight down, and the normal force of m2 on m1, acting up. You've got an extra term in there.

For block m2,

Fn_m2 - Fg_m1 - Fg_m2 = 0 -> Fn_m2 = Fg_m1 + Fg_m2;
this is actually based on a FBD of both blocks together, and gives the correct value of Fn_m2

The rest should just involve basic algebra, to obtain Fn_m1 and, therefore, the value of the kinetic friction force.
yes, using the correct value for Fn_m1

Now, to work on the second part, the x-axis. Block m1:

F - F_kin = m.a
yes, correct

For block m2...here's where I think I don't know what I am doing. The picture of my Halliday book shows block m2 moving, so what kind of forces are acting on m2 in the x-axis? Is there a resulting force derived from the friction between the blocks? I've thought about this for a while and I'm just clueless. Not even sure if my logic for the forces on the y-axis is correct...
Yes, draw a FBD of block 2. What force acts on m2 in the x direction (HINT: use your results from the FBD of block m1, and Newton 3).
 
PhanthomJay said:
no, when you look at the forces acting on m1 inthe vertical direction, using a free body diagram, there are 2 forces acting: its weight down, and the normal force of m2 on m1, acting up. You've got an extra term in there.

this is actually based on a FBD of both blocks together, and gives the correct value of Fn_m2

yes, using the correct value for Fn_m1

yes, correct

Yes, draw a FBD of block 2. What force acts on m2 in the x direction (HINT: use your results from the FBD of block m1, and Newton 3).

Okay, for m1 in y-axis, it'd be: Fn_m2 = Fg_m1, since the only normal force here is coming from the other block.
As for m2, I don't really see why the forces drawn in a FBD for m2 for it don't match for my equation. There is the weight force from m1, and from m2 acting on it downwards and the normal force from the surface.

For m2's forces in the x-axis, after some thinking, this is what I came up with: the friction force in m1 is a reaction against a force applied in m2. Therefore, for block m2,

F_d = m.a, where F_d = F_kin in absolute values. Force F can't be drawn here, it was applied on block m1 only.
 
Siracuse said:
Okay, for m1 in y-axis, it'd be: Fn_m2 = Fg_m1, since the only normal force here is coming from the other block.
Okay there's a lot of subscripts here that lead to confusion, suffice to say that the normal force of m2 on m1 acts upward on m1 and is equal to the weight of blocK m1.
As for m2, I don't really see why the forces drawn in a FBD for m2 for it don't match for my equation. There is the weight force from m1, and from m2 acting on it downwards and the normal force from the surface.
when you draw a FBD of m2, there are 3 forces acting on m2 in the vertical direction: The weight force of m2, the normal force upward from the surface, and the normal force downward from m1 on m2. The weight of m1 does not enter into the FBD of m2, although it happens in this problem to be the same as the normal force acting downward from m1 on m2.

For m2's forces in the x-axis, after some thinking, this is what I came up with: the friction force in m1 is a reaction against a force applied in m2. Therefore, for block m2,

F_d = m.a, where F_d = F_kin in absolute values. Force F can't be drawn here, it was applied on block m1 only.
yes, correct, but be sure in your FBD of m2 that your equation reads F_kin = m2a2, and note that a2 is not the same as a1, I'm not sure if this is clear to you, is it?
 
PhanthomJay said:
Okay there's a lot of subscripts here that lead to confusion, suffice to say that the normal force of m2 on m1 acts upward on m1 and is equal to the weight of blocK m1.
when you draw a FBD of m2, there are 3 forces acting on m2 in the vertical direction: The weight force of m2, the normal force upward from the surface, and the normal force downward from m1 on m2. The weight of m1 does not enter into the FBD of m2, although it happens in this problem to be the same as the normal force acting downward from m1 on m2.

yes, correct, but be sure in your FBD of m2 that your equation reads F_kin = m2a2, and note that a2 is not the same as a1, I'm not sure if this is clear to you, is it?

Alright got it. As for the last line, I can understand that a2 << a1, because, in this case m1<<m2, and F (force applied on m1) >> F_kin. A force of small magnitude on a block of great mass accelerates the block at a much slower rate than a block of small mass pushed by a force of great magnitude.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Calculation of Tensile Forces in Piston-Type Water-Lifting Devices at Elevated Locations'
Figure 1 Overall Structure Diagram Figure 2: Top view of the piston when it is cylindrical A circular opening is created at a height of 5 meters above the water surface. Inside this opening is a sleeve-type piston with a cross-sectional area of 1 square meter. The piston is pulled to the right at a constant speed. The pulling force is(Figure 2): F = ρshg = 1000 × 1 × 5 × 10 = 50,000 N. Figure 3: Modifying the structure to incorporate a fixed internal piston When I modify the piston...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top