Forces and Kinematics Problem - Am I right?

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a physics problem involving forces and kinematics, specifically focusing on calculating the coefficient of friction for a sled being pulled at a constant speed on snow. The parameters include the mass of the sled, the pulling force, and the angle of the rope with respect to the horizontal.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Problem interpretation, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants present various calculations for the coefficient of friction, with some arriving at different values. Questions arise regarding the setup of equations, the use of angles, and the interpretation of results. There is also discussion about the significance of the negative sign in the context of frictional force.

Discussion Status

Participants are actively engaging with each other's calculations and reasoning. Some have provided guidance on the equations used, while others express confusion about the concepts and calculations. There is an ongoing exploration of the correct interpretation of forces and the relationships between them.

Contextual Notes

There are discrepancies in the angles used in calculations, with some participants noting the importance of using the correct angle for accurate results. Additionally, there is a mention of the constraints of homework rules that may limit the depth of assistance provided.

blockitoff
Messages
14
Reaction score
0
Can someone tell me if I'm right? 0.98 seems a bit high for the coefficient of friction?

A 25kg sled is pulled at a steady 1.3 m/s by a rope inclined 40 degrees above horizontal. If the pulling force is 26.7 N, what is the coefficient of friction between the sled runners and the snow?

m = 25 kg, v = 1.3 m/s, Fp = 26.7 N, mgcos40 = Fn = 187.7 N,

Ftotal = ma (Ftotal = 0 because of no acceleration).
Fp + mgsin40 - Ff = 0,
26.7 + 157.5 = Ff, Ff = 184.2.

u = Ff/Fn = 184.2/187.7 = 0.98.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Using g as 9.8 I got 0.697(3sf)
 
Can you please post your work? :smile:
 
[tex]F= \mu R<br /> \\<br /> \mu R + 25gcos50=26.7<br /> \\<br /> \mu 25gsin50=26.7 - 25gcos50<br /> \\<br /> \mu = \frac{26.7-25gcos50}{25gsin50}<br /> \\<br /> \mu = 0.697[/tex]
Sorry it took my a while to sought out the LaTex. lol :blushing: I just wanted you to know I was workin on it.
 
Last edited:
I don't understand that very much. what's muRmuR? like...lol
 
Sorry, I'm having a lot of trouble and that whole long equation just confused me more.
 
it shouldn't come out like that. I'm jus correcting it. I Hate Latex
 
ok cause i don't know where you got all the numbers from
 
[tex]F= \mu R[/tex]
[tex]\mu R + 25gcos50=26.7[/tex]
[tex]\mu 25gsin50=26.7 - 25gcos50[/tex]
[tex]\mu = \frac{26.7-25gcos50}{25gsin50}[/tex]
[tex]\mu = 0.697[/tex]
I've tried to lay it out better
 
  • #10
R is the normal force?

by the way, thank you for helping me along so much so far :)
 
  • #11
No worries. Yeah, R is the normal reaction. mu is the co-effiecent of friction.
 
  • #12
you used 50 degrees as the angle. it's 40 though? :\
 
  • #13
cos50=sin40.
 
  • #14
[tex]F= \mu R[/tex] is the equation for maximal frictional force.
 
  • #15
numerically, that's correct. but i don't understand that concept at all. can you demonstrate it with 40 degrees? i apologize for being so lost :(
 
  • #16
F = uR is, yes.
 
  • #17
Okay. Have you drawn a diagram with the slope and all the forces acting?
 
  • #18
F(total) = ma

F(total) = 0

F(normal) = (m)(g)(cos40) = (25)(9.8)(cos40) = 187.7

F(pulling) - F(friction) + 25(9.8)(sin40) = 0

26.7 + 25(9.8)(sin40) = F(friction)

26.7 + 157.5 = F(friction)

184.2 = F(friction)

F(friction) = F(normal) * mu

mu = F(friction)/F(normal) = 184.2/187.7 = 0.98

The coefficient of friction equals 0.98.
 
  • #19
Yes, I drew a free body diagram.
 
  • #20
blockitoff said:
F(total) = ma
F(pulling) - F(friction) + 25(9.8)(sin40) = 0
Third line down. it should read: F(pulling)-F(Friction)-25(9.8)(sin40)=0 because the component of the weight it acting in the opposite direction to the pulling force.
 
  • #21
oh i see! let me work it out real quick :)
 
  • #22
Sorry I didnt spot it earlier!
 
  • #23
F(total) = ma

F(total) = 0

F(normal) = (m)(g)(cos40) = (25)(9.8)(cos40) = 187.7

F(pulling) - F(friction) - 25(9.8)(sin40) = 0

26.7 - 25(9.8)(sin40) = F(friction)

26.7 - 157.5 = F(friction)

-130.8 = F(friction)

F(friction) = F(normal) * mu

mu = F(friction)/F(normal) = -130.8/187.7 = -0.697

Ok I got it! MY ONLY QUESTION that remains is how did I know to just make -0.697 positive to be 0.697?
 
  • #24
The co-efficent of fiction is always greater than or equal to zero. The negative sign just indicates that it acts in the opposite direction to the pulling force which we decided was positive. You would have got a positive answer if we took the frictional force and weight to be positive with the pulling force being negative. Always give a positive answer for co-effiecent of friction as it is dimensionless (i.e. is scalar because ithas no direction).
 
  • #25
Right, because it can only range between 0 and 1. 0 is like slippery ice with no friction, and 1 is like extremely rough surface. But you explained it perfectly. THANK YOU!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
5K
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K