Forces & Friction: Acceleration & Coefficient of Friction

  • Thread starter Thread starter joeG215
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Forces Friction
AI Thread Summary
A 1 kg box is subjected to a constant force of 2N along a 2-meter board, with the first meter being frictionless and the second meter having friction that stops the box. The acceleration during the first meter is calculated to be 2 m/s², allowing the box to reach a speed of 2 m/s. To decelerate from 2 m/s to rest over the second meter, an acceleration of -2 m/s² is required. This leads to the conclusion that the net force acting on the box is -2N, indicating that the friction force must be 4N. Consequently, the coefficient of friction is determined to be approximately 0.4.
joeG215
Messages
18
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A 1 kg box begins at rest and a hand applies a constant force of 2N along a 2 meter board. The first meter is frictionless, but the second meter has friction that makes the box come to a stop. Time is not give. Coefficient of friction is not given. My question is, is it possible to find acceleration at the 2nd meter and/or the coefficient of friction?


Homework Equations



$F=ma F(f)=uF(n) u= Coef. of friction

The Attempt at a Solution



$F= 2N-F(f) =(1kg)(a)

2N-u(9.8N)=1kg(a) I get stuck with two variables.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Ok so for the first meter you have a box, with a force of 2N being applied to it.

F = ma, so the accel on the box is F/m = 2 m/s^2

Now this box undergoes this accel from rest through 1 meter.

v12=v02+2s(x1-x0)

v12= 0 + 2(2 m / s2)(1m)
v1 = 2m/s

Now, for the box to decelerate from 2 m/s to zero through 1m, you need to have an acceleration of -2 m/s2. You can get this from just doing another kinematic equation or by reason (if it takes 2 m/s^2 to accel from rest to 2m/s through 1 meter, then it should take the same, but opposite to decel to go from 2m/s to rest through 1 meter)

Ok, so now you know that the box must undergo a decel or 2m/s^2 to come to rest after 1 m.

This means that when you sum the forces on the box \sum Fx = max = 1kg* (-2m/s^2)

The net sum must therefore be -2N

The forces acting on the box are the Fhand and the ffriction so sum Fx = Fhand - ffriction = -2N

so ffriction = 4N = \muk*N = \muk*mg

so \muk = about .4
 
of course.. Thanks
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top