Formal properties of eigenfunctions

black_hole
Messages
71
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Give a physicist's proof of the following statements regarding energy eigenfunctions:
(a) We can always choose the energy eigenstates E(x) we work with to be purely real
functions (unlike the physical wavefunction, which is necessarily complex). Note: This does not mean that every energy eigenfunction is real, rather if you fi nd an eigenfunction that is not real, it can always be written as a complex linear combination
of two real eigenstates with the same energy.

Hint: If E(x) is an energy eigenstate with energy eigenvalue E, what can be said about E(x)
?

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



I'm having a hard to deciphering here what is warranted I show in this problem. Does anyone know what this is trying to get at. Maybe my mathematical experience with proofs is getting in the way because I'm trying to do it more generally.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
black_hole said:

Homework Statement



Give a physicist's proof of the following statements regarding energy eigenfunctions:
(a) We can always choose the energy eigenstates E(x) we work with to be purely real
functions (unlike the physical wavefunction, which is necessarily complex). Note: This does not mean that every energy eigenfunction is real, rather if you find an eigenfunction that is not real, it can always be written as a complex linear combination
of two real eigenstates with the same energy.

Hint: If E(x) is an energy eigenstate with energy eigenvalue E, what can be said about E(x)
?

Homework Equations


The Attempt at a Solution



I'm having a hard to deciphering here what is warranted I show in this problem. Does anyone know what this is trying to get at. Maybe my mathematical experience with proofs is getting in the way because I'm trying to do it more generally.

The hint is probably that it satisfies the Schrodinger equation. Can you show that the real and imaginary parts satisfy the equation separately? Show this wouldn't be true if the eigenvalue were not real.
 
Last edited:
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top