Free energy in the free expansion of an ideal gas

AI Thread Summary
In the discussion about the free expansion of an ideal gas, it is established that during this process, which occurs at constant temperature, the change in internal energy (ΔU), heat (Q), and work (W) are all zero. The calculation of the change in Gibbs free energy (ΔG) shows that it is negative when the final pressure (P2) is less than the initial pressure (P1), indicating that the free expansion is a spontaneous process. The conversation raises the question of whether ΔG, often interpreted as the measure of useful work done by the system, is still a valid physical quantity when no work is performed. It is clarified that ΔG represents the difference in free energy between two states and does not depend on the path taken or the work done. Therefore, a negative ΔG can occur without work being done, reinforcing that it serves as a theoretical measure of the maximum possible useful work that could be extracted from the system.
MexChemE
Messages
237
Reaction score
54
Hello PF! Consider the free expansion of an ideal gas. The process occurs at constant temperature, therefore, ΔU = 0, Q = 0, and W = 0. Suppose we are given the initial and final pressures of the gas, and we calculate ΔG = nRT ln(P2/P1). As P2 < P1, ΔG < 0. This is intuitive, as a free expansion is clearly spontaneous. My question is, ΔG is commonly (physically) interpreted as the opposite of the "useful work" done by the system, but in this case the system does zero work. Does this mean ΔG is not an actual physical quantity, but a helpful theoretical measure of the useful work that can be extracted from the system?

Thanks in advance for any input!
 
Chemistry news on Phys.org
All it really tells you is the difference in free energy between the two states. It does not include any specification of path, or work done.
 
  • Like
Likes MexChemE
MexChemE said:
My question is, ΔG is commonly (physically) interpreted as the opposite of the "useful work" done by the system, but in this case the system does zero work. Does this mean ΔG is not an actual physical quantity, but a helpful theoretical measure of the useful work that can be extracted from the system?
ΔG is commonly interpreted as the opposite of the maximum possible useful work (for a flow process) between the initial and final states.

Chet
 
  • Like
Likes MexChemE
Got it, so the system doesn't have to do work for it to have a negative change in free energy.
 
It seems like a simple enough question: what is the solubility of epsom salt in water at 20°C? A graph or table showing how it varies with temperature would be a bonus. But upon searching the internet I have been unable to determine this with confidence. Wikipedia gives the value of 113g/100ml. But other sources disagree and I can't find a definitive source for the information. I even asked chatgpt but it couldn't be sure either. I thought, naively, that this would be easy to look up without...
I was introduced to the Octet Rule recently and make me wonder, why does 8 valence electrons or a full p orbital always make an element inert? What is so special with a full p orbital? Like take Calcium for an example, its outer orbital is filled but its only the s orbital thats filled so its still reactive not so much as the Alkaline metals but still pretty reactive. Can someone explain it to me? Thanks!!
Back
Top