How Does Friction Cause the Bottom Block to Move with the Top Block?

  • Thread starter Thread starter sideman123
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Confused Friction
AI Thread Summary
Friction between the two blocks allows the bottom block to move in the same direction as the top block. When a force is applied to the top block, it generates a frictional force that acts on the bottom block, causing it to accelerate to the right. The top block experiences a friction force from the bottom block that opposes its motion, but since it is moving at a constant speed, the forces are balanced. The bottom block continues to accelerate until it matches the speed of the top block, at which point static friction takes over. Understanding the role of friction is crucial in analyzing the motion of both blocks.
sideman123
Messages
2
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



a 2 kg block rests on a horizontal frictionless surface, and is initially at rest. a 1 kg block rests on top of the 2kg and initially moving at v=3m/s (to the right). the coefficients of friction between he two blocks are MUs=.2 and MUk=.1 . A force is applied to the top block such as to keep it always moving at the same velocity. you can assume the top block never falls off the bottom block. what will the bottom block do?

the answer is always move at a constant speed to the right.

i don't understand this. i know friction exists between the top and bottom block, but how does that get the bottom block to move with the top block to the right. I generally believed friction acts in the opposite direction of which the force is applied?

if it would help, i can post a picture

thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I guess I don't understand the problem. Are the two blocks moving together? Is the top block sliding along the bottom block? Why is a force needed to keep the blocks moving on a frictionless surface?

Sure, post a picture.
 
see the pics-

thanks
 

Attachments

  • Screen Shot 2012-06-07 at 3.44.57 PM.png
    Screen Shot 2012-06-07 at 3.44.57 PM.png
    12.4 KB · Views: 505
  • Screen Shot 2012-06-07 at 3.44.52 PM.png
    Screen Shot 2012-06-07 at 3.44.52 PM.png
    6 KB · Views: 510
sideman123 said:
i know friction exists between the top and bottom block, but how does that get the bottom block to move with the top block to the right. I generally believed friction acts in the opposite direction of which the force is applied?
Friction acts to prevent or oppose slipping between surfaces. If the top block is pushed to the right, the friction from the bottom block will push to the left. And if the bottom block exerts a friction force on the top block, then the top block will exert an equal and opposite friction force on the bottom block--to the right, in this case.

That said, I still don't understand the problem.
 
A free-body diagram always helps...
The external force and friction from the bottom block act on the top block. The top block does not accelerate, so the kinetic friction is balanced by the external force.
Only friction from the top block acts on the bottom block. It accelerates till it reaches the speed of the top block when the friction becomes static.

ehild

(Edited)
 
Last edited:
It is just a relative motion.
To the block below, there's a motion to the left relative to the above block(to the right).
Thus static frictional force is in direction of the top block. Not in direction as you assume.
The static friction will balance this until acceleration greater than μsg.
 
Last edited:
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top