Friction in vertical directions

  • Thread starter Thread starter moonbase
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Friction Vertical
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on calculating the minimum applied force required to prevent block m1 (16 kg) from sliding down block m2 (80 kg) on a frictionless table, given a static friction coefficient of 0.4. The weight of m1 is determined to be 156.96 N, leading to a required normal force of 392.4 N to maintain equilibrium. The participant initially overlooked the effect of m2's acceleration on the applied force, which must account for both blocks' combined mass. The correct applied force must exceed 392.4 N to ensure m1 remains stationary relative to m2.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Newton's laws of motion
  • Knowledge of static friction and its coefficient
  • Ability to draw and interpret free body diagrams
  • Familiarity with basic kinematic equations
NEXT STEPS
  • Review the concept of normal force in static friction scenarios
  • Learn about the dynamics of connected bodies in motion
  • Study the application of Newton's second law (F=ma) in multi-body systems
  • Explore advanced problems involving friction and acceleration in physics
USEFUL FOR

Students studying physics, particularly those focusing on mechanics and forces, as well as educators seeking to clarify concepts related to friction and motion in multi-body systems.

moonbase
Messages
21
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Two blocks (m1 and m2) are being pushed to the right along a frictionless table with such a force that the left block (m1), which is smaller, is above the table and not falling. It is pushed up against m2 (which is on the table), and they have a coefficient of static friction of 0.4 between them. The mass of m1 is 16 kg and m2 is 80 kg. What is the minimum applied force from the left required to keep m1 from sliding down m2?

Homework Equations


fs≤usFnormal
Fnet=ma

The Attempt at a Solution


I drew a force body diagram and found that since there is no vertical movement for m1, the net force is zero so the downward weight force must cancel with the upward frictional force of m2 on m1. Since the weight = 156.96 N, the frictional force must also. This is set equal to 0.4Fnormal to find that the minimum normal force required is equal to 392.4 N. Since this force acts opposite to the applied force, the applied force must be greater than or equal to this number. However, the system is not accepting my answer of 392.4 N. Can anyone point out to me what I did wrong?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
moonbase said:

Homework Statement


Two blocks (m1 and m2) are being pushed to the right along a frictionless table with such a force that the left block (m1), which is smaller, is above the table and not falling. It is pushed up against m2 (which is on the table), and they have a coefficient of static friction of 0.4 between them. The mass of m1 is 16 kg and m2 is 80 kg. What is the minimum applied force from the left required to keep m1 from sliding down m2?

Homework Equations


fs≤usFnormal
Fnet=ma

The Attempt at a Solution


I drew a force body diagram and found that since there is no vertical movement for m1, the net force is zero so the downward weight force must cancel with the upward frictional force of m2 on m1. Since the weight = 156.96 N, the frictional force must also. This is set equal to 0.4Fnormal to find that the minimum normal force required is equal to 392.4 N. Since this force acts opposite to the applied force, the applied force must be greater than or equal to this number. However, the system is not accepting my answer of 392.4 N. Can anyone point out to me what I did wrong?
Let's see if I understand this. An applied force pushes to the right on m1 which in turn pushes m2 to the right.

If the normal force the blocks exert on each other is 392.4 N, then you can find the acceleration of m2. But m1 also has that acceleration.

The applied force must be sufficient to give m1 + m2 that acceleration.
 
Last edited:
Ahh I see, I ignored m2's opposing force. Thanks!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
23
Views
3K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
3K
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
8K
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K