Friction on an inclined plane (freebody diag. included)

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on determining the maximum angle of an inclined plane at which a crate remains at rest, given a static friction coefficient of 0.60 and a crate mass of 10 kg. The initial approach incorrectly equated gravitational and frictional forces without properly incorporating the friction coefficient. After reevaluating the free body diagram, the correct forces were identified: the force of friction is calculated as the normal force multiplied by the coefficient of friction, while the gravitational force acting down the slope is mg*sin(theta). The calculated friction force was 58.8 N, leading to an angle of 36.8 degrees, but this was marked incorrect due to miscalculating the normal force and frictional force. The key takeaway is that the friction force must be accurately derived from the normal force to ensure the crate remains stationary.
iheartbeer
Messages
2
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


what is the max angle the plane can be at so that the crate stays at rest.

static friction coefficient: 0.60
mass of crate: 10kg
max angle of plane: ?my free body diagram http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v217/tylerc13/physprob.jpg

my approach:

I set it up so that the forces of +mg and -mgUk would = 0. My train of thought was that if they canceled each other out there would be no movement... guess not.

edit: i just realized I am not incorporating the frictional coefficient into this, and i might have it a bit backwards. would my positive (downward) force be mg*sin theta and the my negative (upward resistance from friction) force be N*Uk ?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
my *NEW* free body diagram http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v217/tylerc13/physprob-1.jpg

my *NEW* approach:

I reworked my free body diagram and i think i have it setup right, the upward force of friction is the weight in Newtons multiplied by the frictional coefficient. the downward force on the crate is the weight in Newtons multiplied by the sine of the angle of the plane.

my thoughts are that if the angle must be such that it puts less force on the crate than force of friction the crate has at rest.

so i calculated the force of friction on the crate as being N*Uk which is (mg)Uk or (10*9.8)*0.60 = 58.8N

i figured then that the downward force exerted by gravity and the slope must not exceed this value so i used 58.7N as my target downward force to max the angle without going over the frictional force, thus keeping the crate in place.

so i set mg*sin theta = 58.7 getting 98*sin theta = 58.7 then dividing both sides by 98 i get; sin theta= 58.7/98 or

sin theta = .59898 then inverse sin .59898 to get an angle of 36.8 degrees

but this answer is getting marked wrong... where and I going wrong?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
the upslope friction force is NOT the weight times the coefficient of friction. It is the c.o.f times the normal force which you marked as N. What is N equal to?

Also, whichever value you get for the friction force, use it in your calculations (aka don't use 58.7 instead of 58.8) because when the forces are equal, the mass still doesn't move. it is when the downslope force becomes greater then the max friction force that the block starts accelerating down.
 
Thread 'Struggling to make relation between elastic force and height'
Hello guys this is what I tried so far. I used the UTS to calculate the force it needs when the rope tears. My idea was to make a relationship/ function that would give me the force depending on height. Yeah i couldnt find a way to solve it. I also thought about how I could use hooks law (how it was given to me in my script) with the thought of instead of having two part of a rope id have one singular rope from the middle to the top where I could find the difference in height. But the...
Thread 'Voltmeter readings for this circuit with switches'
TL;DR Summary: I would like to know the voltmeter readings on the two resistors separately in the picture in the following cases , When one of the keys is closed When both of them are opened (Knowing that the battery has negligible internal resistance) My thoughts for the first case , one of them must be 12 volt while the other is 0 The second case we'll I think both voltmeter readings should be 12 volt since they are both parallel to the battery and they involve the key within what the...
Back
Top