Galilean Coordinate Transformation (Classical Relativity)

pratikpatel
Messages
3
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



An observer in an inertial reference frame S sees two cameras flash simultaneously. The cameras are 800 m apart. He measures that the first flash occurs at four coordinates given by X1=0, Y1=0, Z1=0 and T1=0, and that the second flash occurs at four coordinates given by X2=800m, Y2=0, Z2=0 and T2=0.

a. If a second observer rides along in a reference frame S' traveling at a speed of 0.90c relative to S, use the Galilean Coordinate Transformation to calculate what he measures for the four coordinates for the first and second camera flashes (in reference frame S')?

b. According to the observer in S', how far apart are the camera flashes (X2' - X1')?

c. According to the observer in S', what is the time difference between the camera flashes (T2' - T1')?

d. According to the observer in S', are the camera flashes simultaneous? Explain.


Homework Equations



Galilean Coordinate Transformation Equations:

x' = x - vt
y' = y
z' = z
t' = t

**********************************************************

When I use the equations above, the values of x', y', z', and t' come up same as x, y, z, and t. Is that right? I am pretty sure I'm doing something wrong here.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
pratikpatel said:
When I use the equations above, the values of x', y', z', and t' come up same as x, y, z, and t. Is that right? I am pretty sure I'm doing something wrong here.
Looks right to me. (The values of x' and x are the same since t = 0.)
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top