Gauss's Law with NONuniform E field

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the net electric flux leaving a closed surface in a nonuniform electric field described by E = (2.70 + 2.20 x^2)i N/C. The participants clarify that the flux through the sides of the surface is zero due to the angle between the electric field and the normal vector being 90 degrees. They focus on the flux contributions from the two ends of the surface, with calculations showing E values at specific points and using the area to determine the flux. The total flux is computed by adding the contributions from both ends, leading to a final value of 5.097. The conversation emphasizes the importance of correctly applying the dot product in flux calculations and understanding when integration is necessary.
Alex G
Messages
24
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A closed surface with dimensions a = b = 0.400 m and c = 0.800 m is located as shown in the figure below. The left edge of the closed surface is located at position x = a. The electric field throughout the region is nonuniform and given by E = (2.70 + 2.20 x2)i N/C, where x is in meters.
https://www.webassign.net/serpse8/24-p-061.gif

A)Calculate the net electric flux leaving the closed surface.

Homework Equations



For a closed surface Integral of E(dot)dA = qenclosed/Epsilon0

The Attempt at a Solution



Obviously I will have to integrate the Electric field here. I began with the simple formula
Int(E dot dA) from 1.2 to 0 because the distance at the edge where the E field leaves is 1.2m out. I believe since the sides are all parallel to the E field those become 0.
So I tried integrating
2.70 + 2.20x^2 dA from 1.2 to 0
I believe dA is x^2 (a=b=x) and dA is the combined infinitesimal areas to produce LxW of the end of the box.
The angle between the exiting E field and the Normal to the plane at the end of the box are parallel thus negligible.
What's going wrong here :-/
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I do not quite follow you but you might not know that dA in the dot product E˙dA is a vector, normal to the surface and pointing outward from the slab. This dot product is equal to E*cos(φ)*dA where φ is the angle enclosed by E and dA and E and dA are the magnitudes of these vectors. At the sides of the slab, the normals of the surfaces are perpendicular to E so cos(φ)=0, the dot products cancel. At the bases, the planes located at x=0.4 and x=1.2, dA is parallel to the x axis. Its direction is opposite to E at x=a (φ=180°) and it points in the same direction as E at x=1.2 (φ=0). The magnitude of dA is dydz on these planes.


ehild
 
This might be a bit simplistic but at x=.4 E=3.02 and area=.16 or Flux=E*A*Cos(180)

at x=1.2 E=5.58 and area=.16 or flux=E*A*cos(0)

No flux through side surfaces just ends. Add the two fluxes to get total flux.

I get a total flux of 5.097
 
RTW69 said:
This might be a bit simplistic but at x=.4 E=3.02 and area=.16 or Flux=E*A*Cos(180)

at x=1.2 E=5.58 and area=.16 or flux=E*A*cos(0)

No flux through side surfaces just ends. Add the two fluxes to get total flux.

I get a total flux of 5.097

The procedure is OK, but check your E values.

At x=0, E=2.7+2.2*0.16=3.052
At x=1.2, E=2.7+2.2*1.44=5.868

ehild
 
X=.4; E=2.7+2.2*0.16=3.052, Area=.16; E=3.052*.16*Cos(180)=-.488 thanks for catching my mistake!
 
Wow thank you both, that was a lot easier than I thought. I suppose I'm just uncertain when I should integrate and when I shouldn't.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top