1. Limited time only! Sign up for a free 30min personal tutor trial with Chegg Tutors
    Dismiss Notice
Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

Gauss's Law

  1. Dec 21, 2009 #1
    Not a hw question:

    A spherical conducting shell of inner radius a and outer radius b carries a total charge of +Q distributed on the surface of a conducting shell.

    http://ocw.mit.edu/OcwWeb/Physics/8-02Electricity-and-MagnetismSpring2002/VideoAndCaptions/detail/embed03.htm [Broken]

    If you watch prof. Lewin, he says that a uniformly distributed charge on a shell has an electric field outside the shell, but not inside. Can someone explain why so? I thought if we had a surface such as a plate, the E-field points out in both directions, but why doesn't it exist in a sphere?

    sorry for no pics.
     
    Last edited by a moderator: May 4, 2017
  2. jcsd
  3. Dec 21, 2009 #2

    Born2bwire

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor
    Gold Member

    The easy answer is Guass' Law. Since we cannot arrange a Gaussian surface inside the shell that encloses any charge, then there is no electric flux and we can conclude by arguments of symmetry (by choosing the proper Gaussian surfaces) that there must be no electric field inside the spherical shell.

    The hard way of proving this is to calculate it out by doing the integration of Coulomb's Law. Obviously though, should you do this you realize that because the electric field has an associated direction, that the contributions from say a patch of charge to the right of your observation point will be countered by a similar patch of charge to the left of your observation point. The shell ensures that you always have a volume of charge surrounding you, so electric field contributions will cancel out. This is the primary geometrical difference in comparison with a sheet of charge.
     
    Last edited: Dec 22, 2009
  4. Dec 22, 2009 #3
    Hi.
    Let us consider simpler but essentially similar case, a spherical shell charged +Q. Inside the shell E=0. Gauss's law is the simplest way of explanation as Born2bwire said.

    To supplement it, consider inward electric field caused by the opposite side of the shell. It reduces inward electric field generated at this side. And it strengthen outward electric field.

    Opposite shell 0 inside ←←← Q →→→ Outside of shell

    Considering charges on shell in opposite side
      
    Opposite shell Q inside __ ← Q →→→→→ outside of shell

    In this way all the other part of charged spherical shell cancel the part here in inward electric field generation.
    Regards.
     
Know someone interested in this topic? Share this thread via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook




Similar Discussions: Gauss's Law
  1. Gauss's Law (Replies: 9)

  2. Gauss's Law (Replies: 3)

  3. Gauss's Law (Replies: 6)

Loading...