Grade 12 chemistry homework help -- 2n^2 electrons possible in each energy level

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around the misunderstanding of the maximum number of electrons in an atom based on the formula 2n^2 for energy levels. A classmate incorrectly concludes that the highest value of n must be 7 or 8 based on the electron count of 118, but this reasoning overlooks that n can theoretically extend to infinity. Additionally, there are not infinite energy levels in a practical sense, as elements have defined electron configurations. The conversation highlights the importance of understanding the limits of electron capacity in relation to known elements. Overall, the reasoning presented is flawed and requires clarification on the nature of energy levels and electron configurations.
allanwinters
Messages
5
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A classmate says "Since there are 2n^2 electrons possible in each energy level, and the atom with the greatest number of electrons has 118 electrons, that must mean that u is the highest possible value for n, because a value of 7 gives 2n^2 = 98 nad a value of 8 gives 2n^2=128.

Homework Equations



a) state two problems with this reasoning
b)How many energy levels are there for a given atom

The Attempt at a Solution


So far I said the problem for his reasoning was that the value of n can range from n=1 to n= infinity for a) and for b) I've said that there are an infinite amount of energy levels in an atom.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
When I was born element with the highest electron count had only 103 electrons.

Also, I never had more than $10.000 on my bank account. Does it mean $10.000 is the largest amount of money bank account can hold?
 
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Back
Top