Gravitational Potential Due to a Thin Rod of Varying Density.

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the gravitational potential and gravitational field due to a thin rod of varying density, defined by the equation λ = ky. The user initially struggles with integrating to find the gravitational potential φ(x) at a point (x,0) but eventually arrives at the expression φ(x) = -Gk[√(x^2+L^2) - x]. For part b, the user also finds success using polar coordinates to determine the gravitational field g at the same point. Overall, the thread highlights the challenges and eventual breakthroughs in solving gravitational potential problems involving variable density.
pelmel92
Messages
18
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



GRAVITATIONAL POTENTIAL AND FIELD DUE TO A “THIN” ROD
A thin rod of length L lies along the +y-axis, with one end at the
origin (see diagram).
Assume:
• The rod has length only- no thickness in other directions.
• The density of the rod increases proportionally to the
y-coordinate: λ = ky, where k is a known constant and λ is in
kg/m
• Gravitational potential is zero at infinity: φ (∞) = 0

a) Find the gravitational potential φ ( x) at a point (x,0) by direct integration.
b) Find the gravitational field g at a point (x,0) by direct integration.

Homework Equations



dφ = -(G dm)/r

The Attempt at a Solution



Still stuck on part a, so that's really the brunt of my question for now (though assistance with part b is more than welcome!).

Using the given density function to solve for dm and substituting √(x^2+y^2) for r, I have an expression for dφ:

dφ = -(Gk y dy)/√(x^2+y^2)

...but I have no idea how to manipulate this to get a soluble integral :( I've been messing around with partial derivatives and polar coordinates for hours, but nothing seems to work.
PLEASE HELP!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Ah, I think I may have figured it out... x isn't actually changing here, so my attempts to relate it to y were completely unnecessary? The answer then (I think) would be:
φ(x) = --Gk[√(x^2+L^2) - x] .

Part b has me a bit stumped though... help would be lovely.
 
Alrighty, figured that bit out on my own as well... polar coordinates work out nicely.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top