Testing GRE Physics Prep for non-physicist

AI Thread Summary
Preparing for the Physics GRE (PGRE) can be challenging, especially for those transitioning from a nuclear engineering background. While many medical physics programs do not require the PGRE, one program does, prompting the need for focused preparation. It's important to review foundational physics topics, particularly those covered in undergraduate courses, such as thermodynamics, statistical mechanics, electromagnetism, and classical mechanics. A solid grasp of these subjects can help mitigate the intimidation of the test. For quantum mechanics, a basic understanding of the initial chapters of Griffiths' textbook may suffice. Ultimately, while the PGRE can be difficult, especially for those without a full physics background, a strategic review of known material and educated guesses on unfamiliar topics can lead to a competitive score. The relevance of the PGRE score in the context of medical physics applications, particularly for candidates with strong medical backgrounds, remains uncertain.
Uranium
Messages
24
Reaction score
0
Hello again,

I'm planning on apply to a few medical physics programs in the fall, most of which do not require the physics GRE subject test. However, one does, and I really want to apply there. My thoughts? It wouldn't hurt to learn some more physics. I am a nuclear engineering major, so I would have a good ways to go to be able to be competitive on the test, but what are some good things to look at in preparation for it. Does it seem like a something I can do? I know that people spend 4+ years studying physics have a hard time with the test, so I am a bit intimidated, but I can at least give it a shot.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I think it will be difficult to cram in an undergraduate education in a few months. What you can do, though, is review what you already know so you won't lose any points that you really shouldn't.
 
A large portion of the PGRE is from the first few subjects you'd have in a physics program. I'm sure they were part of your engineering program as well. I'd make sure you're confident in all of that material.
A few good educated guesses on the other topics and a solid score on the subjects you should have a background for would amount to a fairly decent score. I don't know how that score will compare to students that have had the full physics background though (or how much it will matter in medical physics if you have a solid "medical" background)
 
As an engineering major have you taken
Thermodynamics
Statistical Mechanics
E&M
Mechanics ie. Physics I

If you have, all you would need to do for quantum
is a very rough understanding of the first few
chapters Quantum Mechanics by Griffiths
and sadly that might be overpreparation for the Quantum part.
 
Hey, I am Andreas from Germany. I am currently 35 years old and I want to relearn math and physics. This is not one of these regular questions when it comes to this matter. So... I am very realistic about it. I know that there are severe contraints when it comes to selfstudy compared to a regular school and/or university (structure, peers, teachers, learning groups, tests, access to papers and so on) . I will never get a job in this field and I will never be taken serious by "real"...
Yesterday, 9/5/2025, when I was surfing, I found an article The Schwarzschild solution contains three problems, which can be easily solved - Journal of King Saud University - Science ABUNDANCE ESTIMATION IN AN ARID ENVIRONMENT https://jksus.org/the-schwarzschild-solution-contains-three-problems-which-can-be-easily-solved/ that has the derivation of a line element as a corrected version of the Schwarzschild solution to Einstein’s field equation. This article's date received is 2022-11-15...

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
21
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
12
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
14
Views
6K
Back
Top