GRE Quetion (QM, Electric Transition)

HungryChemist
Messages
140
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


X and Y are two stationary states of a particle in a spherically symmetric potential. In which of the following situations will the wave functions of the two states be orthogonal?
I X and Y correspond to different energies.
II X and Y correspond to different total orbital angular momenta L
III X and Y correspond to the same L but different Lz.



Homework Equations



Selection Rule for Electric Transition?


The Attempt at a Solution



This is GRE type question. I tried attacking this problem by invoking the selection rule for electric transition. I am going to say two state being orthogonal means the situation never occur. So, out of three situations stated above, which one of them has probability of zero occurring? First choice seems to occur frequently, so can't be orthogonal. Second is also not orthogonal. But the last situation, I am not sure. Can anybody help? In fact, if anybody has good web sources that treats electron transition rule in hydrogen atom (not hyperphysics) please, share the link with me. Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You are thinking like a chemist, bless your heart. But all of these conditions are eigenstates corresponding to different eigenvalues of a hermitian operator. They are all orthogonal. And transitions between any of these states can occur. If they are perturbed. If not, then not.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...

Similar threads

Back
Top