Greater Force= Greater Work; box up ramp

AI Thread Summary
When moving a heavy crate up two ramps, a steeper ramp requires more force but does not necessarily mean more work in the absence of friction, as work is defined as W=FD. When friction is considered, the steeper ramp may require less work because the frictional force decreases with greater angles. The angle that minimizes work is not directly related to the coefficient of kinetic friction, as the optimal angle is not 90 degrees. The discussion highlights the importance of understanding gravitational potential energy changes when comparing the two ramps. Ultimately, the relationship between distance and work due to friction is crucial in determining the most efficient ramp.
katysmith
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Hi, this question seems pretty easy, but I was just wondering if I'm missing anything with my solutions.
Two ramps, one steeper than the other, are available to move a heavy crate from the ground onto the bed of a truck. In the absence of friction, it takes more force to push the crate up the steeper ramp. Does this mean it also takes more work to raise the crate onto the bed of the truck along the steeper ramp?
Yes, W=FD, greater F, means great W
Taking friction into account, which ramp requires less work for pushing the crate on the truck?
The steeper ramp, as the frictional force will be less. F=cosO*N*u; greater angles means less frictional force
What is the angle of inclination that minimizes the work, and how is it related to the coefficient of kinetic friction? It seems like the angle that would minimize the work, would be the angle with the least frictional force, but the least frictional force would occur when theta is 90 degrees, or directly vertical, and that doesn't make sense. The coefficient of kinetic friction is not connected to the angle
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I think you got the last 2 correct, but the first one is wrong if there is no friction. Have you learned about how to calculate the change in gravitational potential energy PE yet?
 
As for your first question, ask yourself this:
Is there any difference between the potential energy increase of the crate in the steep case vs. the not-so steep case?

Arggh, Berkeman is even faster than Lucky Luke..
 
"greater angles means less frictional force"

this is utterly false.

"Less distance means less work due to frictional force" is the correct expression.
Do you see the difference?
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top