Griffiths Quantum Mechanics: Solving Angular Momentum with Commutators

  • Thread starter Thread starter Bobbo Snap
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Commutators
Bobbo Snap
Messages
29
Reaction score
0
I'm having a lot of trouble following Griffith's quantum mechanics text. I'm in section 4.3 which discusses angular momentum using commutators. The text proceeds as follows:
[L_x, L_y] = [yp_z - zp_y, zp_x - xp_z]\\<br /> =[yp_z, zp_x] - [yp_z, xp_z] - [zp_y, zp_x] + [zp_y, xp_z]\\<br /> =[yp_z, zp_x] + [zp_y, xp_z] \qquad (1)
Ok, I follow the previous, the last step drops the two middle terms because they do commute. It's the next step I don't get:
[L_x, L_y] = yp_x[p_z, z] + xp_y[z, p_z]
How is Griffiths able to factor out the yp_x \text{ and } xp_y? When I expand eqn (1), I get:
[L_x, L_y] = yp_zzp_x-zp_xyp_z + zp_yxp_z - xp_zzp_y
I don't see how he can factor those out without commuting position operators with momentum operators which you can't do, right?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Oh, never mind. I think I can commute momentum and position operators acting on different variables. So xp_z = p_zx.
 
That's right.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top