Solving a Flux Density Problem: Explaining E and B Field Amplitudes

AI Thread Summary
The problem involves calculating the flux density and the amplitudes of the electric (E) and magnetic (B) fields from a 100 W isotropic quasimonochromatic point source at a distance of 1 m. The flux density is calculated using the formula S = P/4πr^2, resulting in approximately 7.9577 W/m^2. The amplitude of the electric field (E0) is found using the formula E0 = √(2Sμ0/ε0), yielding approximately 5.6719 x 10^-3 V/m. The magnetic field amplitude (B0) is calculated with B0 = √(2Sε0/μ0), resulting in about 3.1834 x 10^-9 T. This analysis demonstrates the relationship between power, flux density, and field amplitudes in electromagnetic radiation.
jlmac2001
Messages
75
Reaction score
0
I have no ideal how to do this problem. Can someone explain it to me? What formula would i use?

An isotropic quasimonochromatic point source radiates at a rate of 100 W. What is the flux density at a distance of 1 m? What are the amplitudes of the E and B fields at that point?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
"Isotropic" means that the emitted power is distributed uniformly over a circular shell. In this case, of radius 1m.
"Quasimonochromatic" means, you may use a harmonic (sinus) wave. Just look up how E and B in such a wave depend on intensity. Key word: Poynting vector.
 


To solve this problem, we can use the formula for flux density, which is given by the equation:

S = P/4πr^2

Where S is the flux density, P is the power radiated by the source, and r is the distance from the source.

In this case, we are given that the power radiated by the source is 100 W and the distance from the source is 1 m. Plugging in these values into the formula, we get:

S = 100/4π(1)^2 = 25/π W/m^2

This means that the flux density at a distance of 1 m from the source is approximately 7.9577 W/m^2.

To find the amplitudes of the E and B fields at this point, we can use the formula:

S = (1/2)√(ε0/μ0)E0^2

Where S is the flux density, ε0 and μ0 are the permittivity and permeability of free space respectively, and E0 is the amplitude of the electric field.

To solve for E0, we rearrange the formula to get:

E0 = √(2Sμ0/ε0)

Plugging in the values for S, μ0, and ε0, we get:

E0 = √(2(7.9577)(4π x 10^-7)/(8.854 x 10^-12)) = 5.6719 x 10^-3 V/m

Similarly, we can find the amplitude of the magnetic field using the formula:

S = (1/2)√(ε0/μ0)B0^2

Rearranging the formula and plugging in the values, we get:

B0 = √(2Sε0/μ0) = √(2(7.9577)(8.854 x 10^-12)/(4π x 10^-7)) = 3.1834 x 10^-9 T

Therefore, the amplitudes of the E and B fields at a distance of 1 m from the source are approximately 5.6719 x 10^-3 V/m and 3.1834 x 10^-9 T, respectively.

In summary, to solve this flux density problem, we used the formula for flux density and the formulas for the amplit
 
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Back
Top