Heat capacity using Debye dispersion relation

torch000
Messages
2
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Using the Debye dispersion approximation, calculate the heat capacity of a harmonic, monatomic, 1D lattice. Next, find the temperature dependence in the low temperature limit. (Assume that the longitudinal mode has spring constant CL = C, and the two transverse modes both have spring constant CT = 0.2C. )

Homework Equations


C_{lattice}=k_{B}\sump ∫d\omegaDp(\omega) \frac{x^{2}e^{x}}{(e^{x}-1)^{2}} , p is over all of the modes
d\omega D_{p}( \omega) = \frac{Lk_{B}T}{hv\pi}dx
where D_{p}( \omega) = density of states
c_p = the spring constants for longitudinal and transverse

The Attempt at a Solution


So I should end up with 3 heat capacities to add together, two transverse and one longitudinal.

C_{lattice}=k_{B}\sum_p \int^{\inf}_{0} \frac{Lk_{B}T}{hv\pi}\frac{x^{2}e^{x}}{(e^{x}-1)^{2}}<br /> \omega D_{p}(\omega) = \sum_{p}\frac{Lk_{B}T}{hv\pi}\frac{\pi^{2}}{3}K\sqrt{\frac{M}{c_{p}}}

C_{lattice} = \frac{\pi L k_{B}}{3h}\sqrt{\frac{M}{c_{p}}}KT(2\sqrt{5}+1)
So this right here is my final solution, and I'm trying to see how far off base I am.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
That was a mistake and should've been (e^{x}-1), and the expression for C_{lattice} is from Kittel if youre wondering where I got it.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top