Heat Transfer Calculation

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on performing a first principles heat transfer calculation for an ideal, monoatomic gas flowing through a stainless steel tube. The user seeks a fundamental approach rather than relying on empirical values for the heat transfer coefficient, h, which are commonly found in literature. They express frustration over the lack of resources that provide a more theoretical calculation. The user is open to an ab-initio calculation at zero velocity as a starting point. Overall, the conversation highlights the challenge of finding detailed theoretical models for heat transfer in laminar flow scenarios.
Gokul43201
Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
Gold Member
Messages
7,207
Reaction score
25
I would like to do a first principles heat transfer calculation for an ideal, monoatomic gas at entry temperature T, and pressure P flowing at velocity v (v is small, so flow is laminar) through a stainless steel tube at some uniform temperature T' > T.

But if someone has done this calculation before, and I find it hard to believe that no one has, I'd rather just copy off them. :redface:

After some moderate searching through Mass & Heat Transfer books, I haven't found anything that doesn't use some literature value of the heat transfer coefficient, h. Where can I find a more fundamental calculation than that ? I will settle for an ab-initio calculation at v=0.
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
There are too many factors to make calculation of the heat transfer coefficient practical. We all resort to empirical numbers for such cases.
 
Hi all, I have a question. So from the derivation of the Isentropic process relationship PV^gamma = constant, there is a step dW = PdV, which can only be said for quasi-equilibrium (or reversible) processes. As such I believe PV^gamma = constant (and the family of equations) should not be applicable to just adiabatic processes? Ie, it should be applicable only for adiabatic + reversible = isentropic processes? However, I've seen couple of online notes/books, and...
I have an engine that uses a dry sump oiling system. The oil collection pan has three AN fittings to use for scavenging. Two of the fittings are approximately on the same level, the third is about 1/2 to 3/4 inch higher than the other two. The system ran for years with no problem using a three stage pump (one pressure and two scavenge stages). The two scavenge stages were connected at times to any two of the three AN fittings on the tank. Recently I tried an upgrade to a four stage pump...
Back
Top