Heat Transfer: Conversation of Energy problem.

AI Thread Summary
In the heat transfer problem, a 2 kg copper block at 100°C is in contact with a 2 kg plastic block at 20°C until they reach equilibrium. The specific heat of plastic is four times that of copper, leading to different temperature changes for each block. The calculations reveal that the temperature change for the copper block is negative, indicating it cools down, while the plastic block heats up. A key point of confusion arises regarding the formulation of the temperature change equations, where the direction of heat transfer must be accurately represented. The discussion emphasizes the importance of correctly defining temperature changes based on whether an object is gaining or losing heat.
Water
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
A 2 kg copper block, initially at 100°C, is brought in contact with a 2 kg plastic block, initially at 20°C. They are kept in contact long enough to reach the same equilibrium temperature. The specific heat of plastic is four times as much as the specific heat of copper.

Which block will go through a larger temperature change? Why?

Since this is a problem early in the first few chapters of a Heat Transfer class, I assume that the two blocks can be treated as a closed system and no heat is lost to the surroundings.

Here is my working, which arrived at an answer that seems illogical.Energy lost by copper = Energy gained by plastic

Since there is negligible change of other energies such as kinetic, potential, etc, assume that,

Thermal energy lost by copper = Thermal energy gained by plastic

mc \Delta T_{copper} = mc \Delta T_{plastic}

Since the masses of both blocks are equal,

(c \Delta T)_{copper} = (c \Delta T)_{plastic}

And since the specific heat of the plastic is four times that of the copper,

c_{copper} \Delta T_{copper} = 4c_{copper} \Delta T_{plastic}

c_{copper}(T_{final} - 373) = 4c_{copper}(T_{final} - 293) (temperatures in Kelvin)

T_{final} - 373 = 4T_{final} - 1172

T_{final} = 266

Therefore, \Delta T_{copper} = 266 - 373 = -107 K

and \Delta T_{plastic} = 266 - 293 = -27 KSince the cooler plastic block must gain heat from the warmer copper block, it is impossible that the temperature change for the plastic block could be negative. What's wrong with my calculations?

Edit: Latex seems to format properly now, thanks Pseudo.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
I think you mean \delta t. ;)
Let me go back and see if I get what you did.
The copper block is at 100C, and the plastic is at 20C... THUS, keeping that in mind, you're supposed to formulate your equation as follows:
mc1 (Ti - Tf) = mc2 (Tf - Ti)
WHY? Well, because obviously the copper block's going to cool down... but the plastic's going to heat up. You can't have one of them being positive and the other being negative and make them equal-- you have to adjust your heat to reflect that.
In any case, you have...
c2 = 4c1, Ti (for the left) = 100, Tf (for the right) = 20C, m = m so you get:
mc1 (100 - Tf) = 4mc1(Tf - 20)
Solve for Tf and compare the temperature differences. :)
 
Oh, so it's backslash, thanks. :)

I'm still not clear on why the delta t on the left is (Ti - Tf) and the delta t on the right is (Tf - Ti). Isn't delta t, the change in temperature, always the final temperature minus the initial temperature, regardless of whether the object in question is heating or cooling?

I thought it worked like this: If an object were cooling, Tf - Ti would be negative, indicating a loss of temperature. If it were heating up, Tf - Ti would be positive, indicating a temperature increase. Could you please explain?
 
Last edited:
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top