Help Solve Skier Problem Homework

  • Thread starter Thread starter peyton
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The skier problem involves calculating the final velocity of a skier descending a 20m hill with an initial velocity of 5 m/s and a weight of 50kg, while considering a frictional force of 40N acting uphill. The total energy at the start includes both kinetic and potential energy, calculated to be 10425J. To find the final velocity, the work done by the friction force must be determined and subtracted from the total energy. The work-energy theorem can then be applied to find the skier's velocity at the bottom of the hill. Proper understanding of energy conservation and the impact of friction is crucial for solving the problem.
peyton
Messages
3
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


if a skier goes down a hill that is 20m high and 70 m long perpendicular to the height... and she weighs 50kg and her intial veloctiy is 5 m/s. how fast is she going at the bottom if the force of gravity up the hill is 40N??
I just don't get it!
PLease help me


Homework Equations


total energy= kinetic energy + gravitational energy

work = Fd



The Attempt at a Solution


Et= .5x50x(5x5)+ 50 x 9.8 x20
= 10425

and i don't know where to go from here please help me!
i have a test tomorrow and i don't understand
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Welcome to PF!

Hi peyton! Welcome to PF! :smile:
peyton said:
Homework Statement [/b]
if a skier goes down a hill that is 20m high and 70 m long perpendicular to the height... and she weighs 50kg and her intial veloctiy is 5 m/s. how fast is she going at the bottom if the force of gravity up the hill is 40N??
I just don't get it!

What a terrible question :frown:

how can gravity be up the hill … doesn't your professor know what "up" means??

and how can anyone have a weight in kg? weight is in Newtons, mass is in kg :rolleyes:

hmm … if her mass is 50kg, the force of gravity down the hill would be about 140 N, not 40 N (it isn't, is it?) …

i've no idea what this question means …

if you have to answer it, I suggest you ignore the 40 N, which is indeed what you've already done …
Et= .5x50x(5x5)+ 50 x 9.8 x20
= 10425

… now what speed does that correspond to? :smile:
total energy= kinetic energy + gravitational energy


"total energy" isn't really a helpful concept (and nobody calls it "Et" :wink:) …

I suggest you say KE + PE = constant, or ∆(KE) = -∆(PE)
 
btw i am Canadian
the 10425J
and it was the force of friction was 40N up hill

i need to find the velocity at the bottom of the hill
 
peyton said:
and it was the force of friction was 40N up hill

D'oh! :rolleyes:

In that case, you need to find the work done by the friction force, and use the work-energy theorem.
btw i am Canadian

ahh! :redface:
 
then what ?
find the difference then use that force to find the velocity at the bottom of the slope
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top