Understanding the Negative Sign in Lenz's Law: A Geometric Interpretation

  • Thread starter Thread starter stfz
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Law Lenz's law
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on understanding the negative sign in Lenz's Law as it relates to Faraday's law of electromagnetic induction. The negative sign indicates that the induced electromotive force (EMF) opposes the change in magnetic flux, which is a qualitative aspect of the law. While both flux and voltage are scalar quantities, the negative sign serves to illustrate the opposing nature of the induced current rather than having direct computational significance. A geometric interpretation suggests that if the flux change is positive, the induced EMF will be negative, indicating the direction of current flow. Ultimately, Lenz's Law provides a clear framework for determining the direction of current and EMF in response to changes in magnetic flux.
stfz
Messages
35
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


I'm trying to see the relationship between the negative sign (Lenz's Law) in Faraday's law. It states that EMF is equal to negative flux change. I understand how to use Lenz's Law to find direction of current and hence EMF, but I am not seeing the relation between the neg sign and the EMF directly, that is, I understand it qualitatively, but not quantitatively in the context of the formula.

Flux and voltage are both scalar quantities, and they measure different things. So how can I geometrically interpret the negative in the formula? What would that mean?

Homework Equations


V= -\frac{d\Phi}{dt}

The Attempt at a Solution


If I draw up a diagram, and flux change is positive, then I know that EMF is negative in the loop. But how do I know which direction it is in? EMF could be measured both ways!

So I'm wondering whether or not the negative sign in Lenz's law simply serves a "qualitative" function, i.e. to let the reader know that it produces a current that opposes the flux change, rather than any computational significance? :P
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The statement of Lenz' law is like this:

Whenever the magnetic flux associated with a closed coil changes, an EMF is induced in the loop, And the direction of the induced EMF is in such a manner that it tends to produce a current that opposes the change in magnetic flux produced it.

-ve sigh in mathematical equation corresponds to this statement.

I think the statement of Lenz's law solves your problem. By that statement you can find what direction current is and hence direction of EMF.
 
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Thread 'Variable mass system : water sprayed into a moving container'
Starting with the mass considerations #m(t)# is mass of water #M_{c}# mass of container and #M(t)# mass of total system $$M(t) = M_{C} + m(t)$$ $$\Rightarrow \frac{dM(t)}{dt} = \frac{dm(t)}{dt}$$ $$P_i = Mv + u \, dm$$ $$P_f = (M + dm)(v + dv)$$ $$\Delta P = M \, dv + (v - u) \, dm$$ $$F = \frac{dP}{dt} = M \frac{dv}{dt} + (v - u) \frac{dm}{dt}$$ $$F = u \frac{dm}{dt} = \rho A u^2$$ from conservation of momentum , the cannon recoils with the same force which it applies. $$\quad \frac{dm}{dt}...
Back
Top