Help with a problem involving motion in two dimensions

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around solving a motion problem involving a boat and a river, where the river flows east at 5 km/h and the boat travels at a 45-degree angle south of east. Participants express confusion about the relevant equations and the correct representation of velocity components, particularly regarding the boat's velocity with respect to the river. The original poster struggles with assumptions about the angle of the boat's travel and the magnitude of its velocity, leading to frustration and a desire to give up. However, through collaborative dialogue, they begin to clarify their understanding of vector relationships and the need to equate expressions for solving the problem. Ultimately, the poster finds renewed motivation and confidence in their ability to tackle the problem.
CVRIV
Messages
12
Reaction score
5
New poster has been reminded to fill out the Homework Help Template when starting a new thread in the Schoolwork forums
I attached an image with problem and the associated illustration.

I don't know what the relevant equations are for this problem.

Each and every time I read the problem I keep drawing a right triangle to represent the velocity components. The problem says the river is flowing east at 5km/h. I am assuming this is the x-component named Vre. It then says the boat is traveling south of eat at 45deg. I am assuming this is the vector with an unknown magnitude, named Vbe. The boat's velocity, with respect to the river(Vbr), is also unknown. In the previous similar problems Vbr was 10km/h and I can't help but assume it's the same for this problem. Also, vBR was perpendicular to the river, but somehow I feel like it's not, for this problem.

I don't know and I am literally ready to just give up and move on because I just don't have time for this.
 

Attachments

  • Exercise_3.9.jpg
    Exercise_3.9.jpg
    22.4 KB · Views: 356
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes Hoophy
Physics news on Phys.org
Welcome to the PF.
CVRIV said:
I was very fortunate to find the very pages on the internet. I'm doing Exercise #39 on page 73. I did Example 3.9 and 3.8(Page 71) without any issues, but Exercise 3.9 completely escapes me.
Do you mean lines 3.9 on page 73? Can you upload a PDF or JPEG snapshot of the part of the problem that is confusing you? That will work a lot better than us all opening your full text and trying to zoom in and decode which part you are asking about. Thanks.

(Click the Upload button at the lower right of the Edit window, or just use the Windows Snapshot tool to grab a copy of the problem, and Cntrl-V Paste it into the Edit window).
 
I edited my original post to be more easily understood.
 
  • Like
Likes berkeman
Can you post your work so far (as vector drawings and equations, preferably)?

As the problem says, you will end up with two equations and two unknowns to solve for.
 
I don't have any work for this problem saved because the work I've done so far was by no means worth saving. I think I figured out what I'm doing wrong though.

I was assuming that the boat is traveling across the river at an angle of 90deg; this is why I kept drawing a right triangle to represent my work. I realized that this isn't the case because the last two problems I solved. Each problem involved the very same boat traveling at the very same speed, 10km/h with respect to the river. In one problem, the boat is traveling at 90deg with respect to the river and i was to solve for the velocity of the boat and angle with respect to earth. I got 11.2km/h @ 26.6deg. The other problem stated that the boat WANTED to travel at 90 with respect to the river. It turned out the boat had to travel at an angle of 30deg with respect to earth, to travel at 90deg with respect to the river.

If the two known magnitudes are the same, 5km/h for the river and 10km/h for the boat with respect to the river, and the angle of the boat traveling with respect to Earth is 45deg, then the angle of the boat traveling with respect to the river can't be 90deg. It has to be less than that.

I think I know what I have to do now.
 
  • Like
Likes berkeman
Sounds like good progress. For me, I have to draw vector diagrams to help me with problems like this. It's easy for me to make mistakes unless I'm careful keeping track of which reference frame my vectors are drawn with respect to (the Earth reference frame, the boat's frame, or one moving with respect to the river, etc.). Keep us posted on what you find. :smile:
 
I give up. I tried the law of cosines and still got it wrong. I didn't even want to use the law of cosines. I wanted to solve it without using LOC. I'm super frustrated. I need to walk away from this. I really need to move on to new stuff. I'm already behind.
 

Attachments

  • 0220191335.jpg
    0220191335.jpg
    25 KB · Views: 322
CVRIV said:
I give up. I tried the law of cosines and still got it wrong. I didn't even want to use the law of cosines. I wanted to solve it without using LOC. I'm super frustrated. I need to walk away from this. I really need to move on to new stuff. I'm already behind.
In your diagram, the dashed line perimeter is a square. Let its sides be h.
Can you get an expression for the known length AB in terms of h?
 
CVRIV said:
Each and every time I read the problem I keep drawing a right triangle to represent the velocity components. The problem says the river is flowing east at 5km/h. I am assuming this is the x-component named Vre. It then says the boat is traveling south of eat at 45deg. I am assuming this is the vector with an unknown magnitude, named Vbe. The boat's velocity, with respect to the river(Vbr), is also unknown.
It is a good start. Let be x the East direction and y the South one. Write up the x and y components of all velocity vectors. How are the velocity vectors ##\vec v_{re}##, ##\vec v_{be}## and ##\vec v_{br}## related?
Do not mind the previous problems, this is independent of them.
 
  • #10
This is my best effort. I had a little more help from another forum but don't fully understand how that person got what they got. I just done get it.
 

Attachments

  • 0221190117a.jpg
    0221190117a.jpg
    35.6 KB · Views: 331
  • 0221190117b.jpg
    0221190117b.jpg
    40.8 KB · Views: 350
  • #11
CVRIV said:
This is my best effort. I had a little more help from another forum but don't fully understand how that person got what they got. I just done get it.
In the 17a image, look at the two x= and two y= equations. Sin(45)=cos(45), right? What does that tell you about x and y? What do you get if you use that in the other two?
 
  • #12
Finally! Oh my god! I'm suppose to know how to do this! Sad. Firstly, I remember solving for two unknowns in Algebra. It came back to me when I read what haruspex said.

The next mistake I made was that I didnt make each expression equal to each other. I was substituting one inside the other.

I can't tell you how happy I am to have figured this out. I have trouble not finishing stuff. If I gave up that woupd of really bothered me.
 

Attachments

  • Capture.JPG
    Capture.JPG
    52.7 KB · Views: 339
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes berkeman

Similar threads

Replies
20
Views
1K
Replies
16
Views
3K
Replies
6
Views
1K
Replies
22
Views
5K
Replies
1
Views
7K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
16
Views
2K
Back
Top