Help with interference question AH physics? exam tomorrow :(

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers around a student seeking help with an interference question from the 2009 AH Physics past paper, specifically regarding their answer compared to the SQA marking scheme. The student expresses confusion about their calculations, particularly with the terms they used and the wavelength (λ) of 580 nm. Respondents point out discrepancies in the student's approach, suggesting that their calculations do not align with the expected results. They encourage the student to take their time and clarify their understanding of the concepts involved. The conversation emphasizes the importance of careful calculation and comprehension in preparation for the upcoming exam.
ah4p
Messages
21
Reaction score
0
Could someone please explain this question to me I'll include what I thought the answer was and the actual SQA answers.

Please can you read my answer just to see what I'm doing wrong and what I don't understand

It's from the 2009 past paper AH physics

Thanks so much I really appreciate any help
smile.png
exam tomorrow ;(
1. Homework Statement

attachment.jpg


Homework Equations



these are gien below in my attampt and in the SQA marking scheme included below

The Attempt at a Solution


attachment.jpg
this is the answer given by sqa

attachment.jpg
thanks very very very much
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Your 2 n t looks more like 4 n t and what you write down doesn't correspond to what you calculate.

Furthermore, you and sqa both seem to know ##\lambda##. We don't.

So: work a little less hasty, and you'll be just fine. Good luck tomorrow !
 
  • Like
Likes ah4p
BvU said:
Your 2 n t looks more like 4 n t and what you write down doesn't correspond to what you calculate.

Furthermore, you and sqa both seem to know ##\lambda##. We don't.

So: work a little less hasty, and you'll be just fine. Good luck tomorrow !
sorry λ is 580nm

thanks so much for ur reply
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top