Help with Pressure Calculation at Point C

AI Thread Summary
Pressure at Point C can be calculated using Bernoulli's Theorem, provided that Points A, B, and C are in the same streamline. The initial pressure at Point A is 559 mbar, and the dimensions of the cylinders influence the flow characteristics. Changing the shape of the chamber from a cylinder to an oval does not invalidate the application of Bernoulli's Theorem, as long as the flow remains incompressible and irrotational. The discussion emphasizes the importance of understanding fluid dynamics principles for accurate pressure calculations. Mastery of these concepts is essential for selecting the appropriate umbrella valve for the system.
anthonynichola
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
Hello, is there anyone who can help me with this? I am completely stumped. Here is the situation:

Point A: Water is flowing into a valve at 559 (mbar) of pressure and into a cylinder that's 12 mm long and 7mm in diameter.

Point B: It then will enter another cylinder that is 40 mm long 10 mm in diameter.

Point C: At this point it will enter another cylinder 5mm long and 7mm in diameter.


Im trying to figure out what the pressure will be at Point C so that I can choose the correct umbrella valve to use so that water flows out of the chamber.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
anthonynichola said:
Hello, is there anyone who can help me with this? I am completely stumped. Here is the situation:

Many... :smile:

Point A: Water is flowing into a valve at 559 (mbar) of pressure and into a cylinder that's 12 mm long and 7mm in diameter.

Point B: It then will enter another cylinder that is 40 mm long 10 mm in diameter.

Point C: At this point it will enter another cylinder 5mm long and 7mm in diameter.


Im trying to figure out what the pressure will be at Point C so that I can choose the correct umbrella valve to use so that water flows out of the chamber.

If all the points : A,B and C lie in the same streamline, you can apply "Bernoulli's Theorem", at A,B and C respectively.

Best of luck buddy ! :)
 
Thanks! Does this apply also if I change the shape of the chamber? Meaning, instead of a cylinder its an oval? I am young and inexperienced lol
 
anthonynichola said:
Thanks! Does this apply also if I change the shape of the chamber? Meaning, instead of a cylinder its an oval?

Provided that when the shape of chamber is changed, that is A,B and C are ovals, then also you can apply Bernoulli's Theorem, if A,B and C lie in a same streamline.

I'm young and inexperienced lol

And So am I. :-p
 
If the flow is incrompressible and also irrotational then you can apply Bernulli's theorem between any points in the flow.
 
Thread 'Is 'Velocity of Transport' a Recognized Term in English Mechanics Literature?'
Here are two fragments from Banach's monograph in Mechanics I have never seen the term <<velocity of transport>> in English texts. Actually I have never seen this term being named somehow in English. This term has a name in Russian books. I looked through the original Banach's text in Polish and there is a Polish name for this term. It is a little bit surprising that the Polish name differs from the Russian one and also differs from this English translation. My question is: Is there...
This has been discussed many times on PF, and will likely come up again, so the video might come handy. Previous threads: https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/is-a-treadmill-incline-just-a-marketing-gimmick.937725/ https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/work-done-running-on-an-inclined-treadmill.927825/ https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/how-do-we-calculate-the-energy-we-used-to-do-something.1052162/
Hi there, im studying nanoscience at the university in Basel. Today I looked at the topic of intertial and non-inertial reference frames and the existence of fictitious forces. I understand that you call forces real in physics if they appear in interplay. Meaning that a force is real when there is the "actio" partner to the "reactio" partner. If this condition is not satisfied the force is not real. I also understand that if you specifically look at non-inertial reference frames you can...
Back
Top