Help with quick integration problem

  • Thread starter Thread starter Pepsi24chevy
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Integration
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around deriving algebraic expressions for position, velocity, and acceleration from a given velocity graph that starts at (0, 50) and ends at (10, -50). The slope of the velocity graph is calculated as -10, leading to the velocity equation v(t) = -10t + 50. The acceleration is determined to be -10, as it corresponds to the slope of the velocity line. To find the position function x(t), the anti-derivative of the velocity function is computed, resulting in x(t) = -5t² + 50t. There is a disagreement regarding the slope, with one participant suggesting it should be -5 instead of -10, indicating a need for clarification on the graph's starting point.
Pepsi24chevy
Messages
65
Reaction score
0
Say I got this velocity graph. Assuming X=0, at T=0, write correct algebraic expressions for x(t), v(t), and a(t) with appropriate numerical values inserted for all constants.

Graph: (connect lines(-) to make straight line going from 0,50 to 10, -50

Vx (m/s)
50
!-_
! - _
!_______________
! -_ 10
! -
! -_
-50
How would i go about solving this problem?
Well graph wont' show up right, but it starts at (0,50), and it a straight line down to (10,-50)
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
This is unclear to me.
 
Can u understand it now?
 
The velocity graph is a straight line from (0,50) to (10,-50) so it should be easy to calculate that the slope is (-50-50)/(10-0)= -10.
The equation of the velocity is v= -10t+ 50.
Of course, the acceleration is just the slope of that line: -10.

I don't know what math you have to find the position function. If you have taken calculus, the position is an anti-derivative (integral) of the velocity function: the anti-derivative of v=-10t+50 is -5t2+ 50t+ C where C is some constant. Since we are told that x= 0 when t=0, x(0)= -5(0)+ 50(0)+ C= 0 so C= 0. The position function is x(t)= -5t2+ 50t.

If you can't use calculus, in this simple situation (acceleration is constant) you can argue that the change in position is the area under the graph. For fixed T>0, The area under the graph is a trapezoid with one base 50 (at t=0), the other base 50-10T (at t=T) and height t. The area of that trapezoid is (1/2)h(b1+b2)= (1/2)T(50+50-10T)=(1/2)(100T- 10T2)= 50T- 5T2. Since the initial x value was 0, the position is just that change in position:x(t)= 50t- 5t2 just as before.

Yet another way is to argue that, with constant acceleration, we can treat this a a constant velocity problem by averaging the first and last velocities: the first velocity is 50 and the last velocity (at t= T) is 50- 10T so the average is (50+ (50- 10T))/2 = 50- 5T. Moving for time T at constant velocity 50- 5T, the object will move distance T(50- 5T)= 50T- 5T2 just as before.
 
If I understand this question, you are given a graph with velocity on the y-axis and time on the x-axis.
You then have a straight line from (0,50) to (10,-50), right?

If so, then that line represents the velocity of an object at any given time. From this graph you can imagine a car that is initially traveling at 50mph at time=0, then slows down to zero mph at t=5, and begins to reverse direction to 50mph backwards.

Knowing the following relationships:
x(t) is position of the car at a any given time.
v(t) is velocity at any given time = x'(t)
a(t) is acceleration at any given time = x"(t) or v'(t).

From your graph, you can determine the slope of the velocity. Write this in the form of v(t)=mx+b.
To find the position, x(t), you integrate the expression you wrote for v(t).
To find the acceleration, a(t), you take the derivative of the v(t) expression you wrote.

I hope I understood the question, and let us know if this helps you.
Post your answer here and I will see if it agress with what I have, I hope so!
 
Halls of Ivy-
I agree with the method of your response, however I think you made an error on the slope. It should be -5. The start point of the graph is (50,0).
Recheck that and let me know what you think.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top