Help with understanding this rigid-body equilibrium problem

  • Thread starter Thread starter Kolika28
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Equilibrium
AI Thread Summary
Choosing the right object or point to apply equations in rigid-body equilibrium problems is crucial for simplifying calculations. It's recommended to make free body diagrams for the relevant objects, as they help identify key forces and torques. When computing torques, selecting a point where a force acts can eliminate that force from contributing to the torque, simplifying the problem. In exam situations, it's beneficial to document your thought process to demonstrate understanding, even if some calculations seem straightforward. Practice and familiarity with different scenarios will enhance the ability to identify the correct focus points during problem-solving.
Kolika28
Messages
146
Reaction score
28
Homework Statement
I have a hard time understanding rigid-body equilibrium problem, especially when it a system of several objects. Sorry for asking so much here, but my exam is coming up and I really want to make sure that I try to understand all the things that makes me confussed.
Relevant Equations
##\sum F_x=0##
##\sum F_y=0##
##\sum \tau=0##
So here are two problems I have been working with lately:
1591480954147.png

1591480992588.png

I have solved both, so I don't need the help to find the answers. The thing that confusses me is which object one should choose to apply the equations above. When it comes to the first problem, we apply the equations to the pole, but why not the box? And in second problem, we apply them to the point where the three strings meet. I had to look at the solution to find out which object or point I should focus on. But I'm afraid it won't be obvious to me on the exam what object or point to pick. Does anyone have some tips?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Kolika28 said:
which object one should choose
...
some tips?
Make free body diagrams. The ones for W, pulley or wire in the first problem and the ones for the masses and the pulleys in the second problem will be boring. The obvious key candidates will pop up pretty soon.
 
  • Like
Likes Kolika28
For torques:

You can compute torques about any point you wish. Given that freedom, you should pick the point that will lead to the easiest computations. In particular, if a force is acting at a point, and you compute torques about that same point, that force will not contribute a torque because the distance to the point is zero, so that's one torque less to worry about. Such simplifications are the first things I look for when choosing where I'm computing torques about.

For forces:

In the first problem, I would not bother writing it down for the box, because it's in a simple enough situation where you can figure out the tension in the string in your mind.

Same for box 1 and 3 in the second problem.

In an exam, you might still want to write it down just to show the person who will correct that you understood.
 
  • Like
Likes Kolika28, Lnewqban and Delta2
Kolika28 said:
Homework Statement:: I have a hard time understanding rigid-body equilibrium problem, especially when it a system of several objects. Sorry for asking so much here, but my exam is coming up and I really want to make sure that I try to understand all the things that makes me confused.
...
The thing that confusses me is which object one should choose to apply the equations above. When it comes to the first problem, we apply the equations to the pole, but why not the box? And in second problem, we apply them to the point where the three strings meet. I had to look at the solution to find out which object or point I should focus on. But I'm afraid it won't be obvious to me on the exam what object or point to pick. Does anyone have some tips?

Please, don't be sorry for asking; somebody here will always be happy to help you.
These problems require practice, time and patience.

Normally, the questions will guide you to the object which forces you need to analyze, decompose in their x and y components and later calculate.
If you apply the equations to the wrong object or point of a mechanism, you soon will understand that such choice is not taking you too far.

Nothing lost at that point, other than time, you keep going with other points and keep collecting information that will help you determine the magnitudes and directions of forces and moments.
 
  • Like
Likes Kolika28 and Delta2
Thank you so much everybody for your relplies, I really appreciate it!:smile: I will now try to solve some more problems like this with your comments in mind, and see if I understand it better now.
 
  • Like
Likes PhDeezNutz
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Thread 'Variable mass system : water sprayed into a moving container'
Starting with the mass considerations #m(t)# is mass of water #M_{c}# mass of container and #M(t)# mass of total system $$M(t) = M_{C} + m(t)$$ $$\Rightarrow \frac{dM(t)}{dt} = \frac{dm(t)}{dt}$$ $$P_i = Mv + u \, dm$$ $$P_f = (M + dm)(v + dv)$$ $$\Delta P = M \, dv + (v - u) \, dm$$ $$F = \frac{dP}{dt} = M \frac{dv}{dt} + (v - u) \frac{dm}{dt}$$ $$F = u \frac{dm}{dt} = \rho A u^2$$ from conservation of momentum , the cannon recoils with the same force which it applies. $$\quad \frac{dm}{dt}...

Similar threads

Back
Top