Hertzian Static Contact Stress Acceptance Criteria

AI Thread Summary
A static contact stress of 670 N/mm2 has been calculated using Shigley's Mechanical Engineering Design, but there is no established acceptance criteria for this value. Previous discussions suggest a pass criterion of 2.5 times the yield strength of Grade 5 Structural Steel, which has a yield strength of approximately 355 N/mm2. A reference from E.J. Hearn's "Mechanics of Materials" indicates that uncontained plastic flow begins at contact stress levels around 2.8 times the yield strength. It is noted that while Grade 5 steel is ductile enough for this approach, high-strength, brittle materials require more careful evaluation due to potential cracking from service factors. Overall, surface roughness can significantly influence stress levels in contact scenarios.
crobb
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
I have calculated a static contact stress of 670 N/mm2 using formula from Mechanical Engineering Design, Shigley, 5th Edition.

My problems lies that there is no acceptance criteria. I'm using Grade 5 Structural Steel (yield~355 N/mm2).

Previous threads have stated that a 2.5 * yield can be used for pass criteria but i can't this referenced in any code or book.

Can anyone provide a reference or justification for 2.5 * yield?
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
I have now found a reference for this value:

Mechanics of Materials, 2nd Edition, E.J. Hearn. page 779 states 'uncontained plastic flow' commences when contact stress --> yield * 2.8
 
Hello crobb and welcome to Physics Forums.

Yes grade5 structural steel is sufficiently ductile for this approach to work.

High strength more brittle steels (and other materials) need more careful consideration - the outcome depends upon service factors such as grit or corrosion in rollers initiating a crack.

Post again if you want more.
 
crobb said:
I have now found a reference for this value:

Mechanics of Materials, 2nd Edition, E.J. Hearn. page 779 states 'uncontained plastic flow' commences when contact stress --> yield * 2.8

Usually, Hertz contact stresses are judged by the shear stress just below the surface. It will be ~211 N/mm2 in your case. Using Tresca's criterion, a minimum yield stress of ~422 N/mm2 will be required (for ductile materials). But yes, in static cases you can often allow for higher stress.

Note that surface roughness can drastically reduce the stresses.

You can use my freeware program to quickly calculate the Hertzian stresses at http://en.vinksda.nl under 'Toolkit'.

Jaap
 
How did you find PF?: Via Google search Hi, I have a vessel I 3D printed to investigate single bubble rise. The vessel has a 4 mm gap separated by acrylic panels. This is essentially my viewing chamber where I can record the bubble motion. The vessel is open to atmosphere. The bubble generation mechanism is composed of a syringe pump and glass capillary tube (Internal Diameter of 0.45 mm). I connect a 1/4” air line hose from the syringe to the capillary The bubble is formed at the tip...
Thread 'Physics of Stretch: What pressure does a band apply on a cylinder?'
Scenario 1 (figure 1) A continuous loop of elastic material is stretched around two metal bars. The top bar is attached to a load cell that reads force. The lower bar can be moved downwards to stretch the elastic material. The lower bar is moved downwards until the two bars are 1190mm apart, stretching the elastic material. The bars are 5mm thick, so the total internal loop length is 1200mm (1190mm + 5mm + 5mm). At this level of stretch, the load cell reads 45N tensile force. Key numbers...
I'd like to create a thread with links to 3-D Printer resources, including printers and software package suggestions. My motivations are selfish, as I have a 3-D printed project that I'm working on, and I'd like to buy a simple printer and use low cost software to make the first prototype. There are some previous threads about 3-D printing like this: https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/are-3d-printers-easy-to-use-yet.917489/ but none that address the overall topic (unless I've missed...

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
13K
Replies
1
Views
4K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
5K
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
65
Views
10K
Replies
7
Views
3K
Back
Top