Hi there!
If (big IF, but that's so simpler!) you consider gases to be perfect, then the mechanical power you can extract from them in adiabatic expansion is the enthalpy variation which in turn depends only on the input to output temperature difference.
At identical pressures (or pressure ratio), a higher input temperature means more temperature drop. If the pressure ratio increases (that's the case of saturated steam AND of steam that shouldn't condensate) then you exploit even more of the input temperature.
That's why people like to have a high input temperature for any gas turbine. It means power and efficiency.
Now, steam is more complicated. You invest a lot of heat just to boil it, and this heat is lost if steam can't condensate in the turbine. So the more heat you add once water is gaseous, the lower the relative loss into boiling water first.
However, I learned as so many people did that steam shouldn't condensate in the turbine, or it will destroy it or lessen the efficiency. Completely wrong.
In PWR (nuclear reactors with pressurized water), the maximum achievable temperature is 374°C so water remains liquid around the fuel rods, and even less hot to have a margin and keep a good density for water. So steam temperature is uncomfortably low.
Guess what? Designers just decided to let steam condensate in the turbine. It means that pressure is higher, giving smaller turbines. It means that the condensing fraction of steam gives heat to the gaseous fraction, thus keeping it warmer than a gas would be when expanding - they get a part back from the heat invested in boiling first the water, and efficiency is better.
In the Westinghouse technology, saturated steam expands in the high pressure stage (and condensates partially there), then is dried (liquid is separated), heated again (by injecting some high pressure steam in it I think) and sent to the low pressure stage. Erosion doesn't look so horrible, as blades are simply made of a variant of X20Cr13 (Aisi 420) and last for a few years.