How Can I Accurately Measure Light Intensity After Polarization?

AI Thread Summary
To accurately measure light intensity after polarization for an experiment confirming Malus' Law, using a bulb as the light source and two polarizing lenses is effective. The intensity can be measured using an irradiance detector, which provides readings in LUX. It is unnecessary to convert LUX to W/m^2, as the ratio of intensity before and after the polarizer is sufficient for analysis. Graphing the angle of the analyzing polarizer against the measured intensity should yield a cosine curve, supporting the principles of Malus' Law. This approach will help validate the experiment's findings.
ellion71
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Part of my independant investigation requires me to carry out an experiment, which when I graph results, would confirm Malus' Law.

I plan on using a bulb as my ambient source and two polarizing lenses. I will then measure the intensity of the light after polarization. Hopefully, if i graph the angle of the analyzing polarizer against intensity I will get a Cosine curve.

However, I am not quite sure on how to measure the intensity of the light after polarization.

Thanks in Advance
Any help/advice would be much appreciated.


P.S
My lecturer has suggested using a irradiance detector which measures in LUX but I am not sure how to convert a value in LUX to a value in W/m^2.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You don't need to convert. The ratio of the intensity after the polarizer to the ratio of the intensity before the polarizer is all you need to know in order to confirm Malus' Law.
 
Last edited:
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top