At the same time, in starting to analyze the problem I have come to realize that by using a 90° spring configuration you are already placing yourself at a disadvantage because the force vector of a deflected arm is directly perpendicular to the arm and the resulting resisting force is the vertical component of that vector. In equation form the direct spring lifting force for each arm = Fsprg*cos θ, where θ is the angle between the horizontal top of your plate and one arm of the spring. You might be better served by using a style "a" flat spring that would load faster with less lifting force loss due the initial leg angles in your current spring.
In addition to the direct lifting force of the spring there is also a horizontal component of F friction = F*sin θ * "the friction coefficient of the spring material against the plate material (for dry stl on dry stl, is around .57)". The result is that while the direct lifting force decreases with spring deflection, the friction force that also acts to resist the 10k load increases; however, I have to caution you that your design would be best based upon the direct lifting force without depending upon that friction component.
With all of that said, the formula for the spring total lifting force at a deflection angle is F = Fsprg*cos θ
Where: Fsprg = 2*c*α*L;
α = the angular deflection of the spring
θ (the angle between one arm of the spring and horizontal top face of the slotted plate) = α + 45°, and;
L (the length of one arm from the spring center to one slot end) = .5*L slot / cos θ
Using that as a basis I performed the Excel analysis of your current spring with the result shown as a picture below:
Note: I am only including the picture of the analysis rather than uploading the actual excel file because some members of the forum are uncomfortable about posting an actual Excel file on a thread; but, if you feel safe opening this type of file then I will be glad upload the Excel analysis for your review and use.
View attachment 227486