How can I linearize the equation for q/m in terms of V?

  • Thread starter Thread starter GodsChild086
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Curve
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around linearizing the equation for the charge-to-mass ratio (q/m) of an electron in terms of voltage (V) using a cathode ray tube experiment. The initial equation presented is v²/Br = q/m, and through manipulation, the user derives q/m = 2V/B²r². To linearize this equation, they express it in the form y = mx, identifying 2V as the dependent variable (y) and B²r² as the independent variable (x). The user confirms that the graph should plot 2V on the y-axis and B²r² on the x-axis, ensuring the slope represents q/m. Overall, the user successfully navigates the process of linearization and seeks validation of their approach.
GodsChild086
Messages
22
Reaction score
0
Curve STRAIGHTENING...ARGH!

Yes, curve straightening...every high school student's favorite thing... :confused:

So in my Physics class, our teacher did a demo with the CRT (cathode ray tube) and then he assigned us with the lab exercise. Here are the components of what I'm supposed to include:

Here's the equation presented when Thomson discovered the charge to mass ratio of an electron:

v²/Br = q/m ; where: v = velocity (m/s)
B = magnetic field strength (T)
q = charge on electron (C)
m = mass (kg)
r = radius (m)


Challenge: Find the equation for q/m in terms of V.

Okay, this part I got.

Equations I used:

Ep=Ek
qV = 1/2mv² and the other equation used: v²/Br = q/m
[/color]

Using the first question I solved for v²:

qV = 1/2mv² ; v² = 2qV/m[/color]

My next step taken:

V/Br = q/m ; q²/m² = v²/B²r²

q²/m² = 2qV/mB²r²

Here is the equation for q/m in terms of V:

q/m = 2V/B²r²[/color]

Then we played around with the cathode ray tube, and told us to make a chart. It's for each time he increases the diameter of the circle (beam of electrons), we record the voltage.

This is another challenge he set for us:

Write the equation so that q/m is the slope.

Here's what I did...I'm not sure if I linearized it right (bad grammar...English is not my first language, so I apologize for this).

So I started with this equation again:

q/m = 2V/B²r²[/color]

Equation for a straight line is: y = mx + b

In this case, I don't have a 'b', so it's just y = mx

My equation (to linearize) I came up with is:

y = mx

2V=(q/m)(B²r²) ; where: 2V is the 'y part'
(q/m) is the 'm part' (slope)
and (B²r²) is the 'x part'

After coming up with our equation, he said that make a new table of values. With our new table of values, he said to make a straight-line graph. So my question is (after going through all this mess of typing), is my table going to have a column for 2V and B²r²? As for the graph, is it going to be 2V vs. B²r²? (Where 2V is on the y-axis and B²r² is on the x axis)?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
GodsChild086 said:
So my question is (after going through all this mess of typing), is my table going to have a column for 2V and B²r²? As for the graph, is it going to be 2V vs. B²r²? (Where 2V is on the y-axis and B²r² is on the x axis)?

Well, in a word: yes.

You've already answered your own question haven't you?

GodsChild086 said:
y = mx

2V=(q/m)(B²r²) ; where: 2V is the 'y part'
(q/m) is the 'm part' (slope)
and (B²r²) is the 'x part'
 
I was just wondering if I did everything right...

That's all...cause it seemed complicated at first...
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top