How can I show the sun rotates?

  • Thread starter Thread starter SecretSnow
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Sun The sun
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the relationship between the sun's orbit around the solar system's center of mass and its rotation about its own axis. It clarifies that while the sun has angular momentum due to its orbit, this does not inherently mean it must rotate, as the two concepts are not directly connected. The conversation also touches on the direction of angular momentum and its relevance in conservation principles, questioning its practical applications. Additionally, the concept of precession in relation to flywheels is explored, emphasizing that the angular momentum of a spinning flywheel influences its motion significantly. Ultimately, the sun's rotation is acknowledged as a phenomenon without a definitive explanation provided in the discussion.
SecretSnow
Messages
66
Reaction score
0
Hi guys, can I say that since the sun orbits around the centre of mass of the solar system, it has angular momentum L=mvr. And since L=Iw, the sun itself will rotate about its own axis. Am I right to say that? However, conceptually speaking, is there a reason why the sun rotates?

Also, what is the purpose of the direction of angular momentum? Is it just mainly used in conservation of angular momentum? I don't understand the real application of its direction.

One very important qns when it comes to flywheel and angular momentum. I've searched for a video on YouTube and it says the angular momentum due to the torque of the weight of the fly wheel which makes it rotate vertically, is smaller than the angular momentum of the spinning flywheel, and hence it does not rotate like its dropping down that fast when it is spinning, which is what is called precession. Is this true? Why would a larger angular momentum take precedence in the overall motion? Isn't it the same as x-y 2D trajectory motion?? Thanks a lot people!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
No, it does NOT follow that since an object orbits around some point that it must also rotate around its own axis. The two are not at all connected.
 
HallsofIvy said:
No, it does NOT follow that since an object orbits around some point that it must also rotate around its own axis. The two are not at all connected.

Why are they not connected? In other cases, however, can I use mvr=Iw this relationship? Because generally speaking, is this relationship true?

Anyway, is there no explanation why the sun rotates? It just does so?
 
Oh wait I noticed my error. The mvr=Iw applies to only to body's angular momentum when rotating by itself and r is the distance to cm from point.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top