How Can I Solve for the Forces on Pruning Shears with Three Subsystems?

  • Thread starter Thread starter wnvl1
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Forces
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around solving for forces on pruning shears using three subsystems of equations. The first subsystem includes equations related to horizontal and vertical forces, while the second and third subsystems address relationships between forces and components. A key issue identified is the presence of nine equations but only six unknowns, leading to redundancy in the equations. Specifically, the first equation from each subsystem is noted as redundant, which simplifies the problem. The clarification helps the original poster realize that not all equations are necessary for a solution.
wnvl1
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Homework Statement
Find the forces in hinches B, C and D.
Relevant Equations
Sum forces = 0 and sum torques = 0
First subsystem:

$$C_x + F_{DE} \cos(45) = 0$$

$$C_y + F_{DE} \sin(45) + 20= 0$$

$$F_{DE} \sin(45) \times 25 + 20 \times 150= 0$$Second subsystem:

$$B_x - C_x = 0$$

$$B_y - C_y - A_y - 20= 0$$

$$-F \times 150 + A_y \times 60 - C_x \times 30 = 0$$Third subsystem:

$$-B_x - F_{DE} \cos(45) = 0$$

$$A_y -B_y - F_{DE} \sin(45)= 0$$

$$-A_y \times 60+ F_{DE} \sin(45) \times 55 = 0$$Problem is that I have 9 equations and only 6 unknwowns.
 

Attachments

  • 9G6ey.png
    9G6ey.png
    9.9 KB · Views: 148
  • jsXKy.jpg
    jsXKy.jpg
    56.1 KB · Views: 152
Physics news on Phys.org
Some of your equations are redundant. For example, consider the first equation in each subsystem. These three equations are redundant.
 
  • Like
Likes wnvl1
Thank you, I see. It was in my mind that all equations were needed. This solves my problem.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top