How can the inner product of two signals be calculated?

Jncik
Messages
95
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Hi

suppose

you're given two signals for example

x_{1}(t) = cos(3 \omega_{0} t)
x_{2}(t) = cos(7 \omega_{0} t)

and you want to find out the inner product

Homework Equations


The Attempt at a Solution



I mean, it's an integral right? But what will the boundaries be? from -oo to +oo or are we interested only in 1 period, hence from 0 to T?

thanks in advance
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Jncik said:

Homework Statement


Hi

suppose

you're given two signals for example

x_{1}(t) = cos(3 \omega_{0} t)
x_{2}(t) = cos(7 \omega_{0} t)

and you want to find out the inner product

Homework Equations


The Attempt at a Solution



I mean, it's an integral right? But what will the boundaries be? from -oo to +oo or are we interested only in 1 period, hence from 0 to T?

thanks in advance

Both signals have fundamental frequency \omega_0. So integration over any integer multiple of the fundamental period gives the same result.
 
thanks for your reply

so, if I took from -T to T it would be an interval 2 times larger than the interval of a period, which is correct right?

but if I integrate from 0 to T I will get a different result

do you mean by "the same result" that the answer to a question that wants an inner product can include any interval of integration no matter what the final arithmetic result will be?

thanks in advance
 
Jncik said:
thanks for your reply

so, if I took from -T to T it would be an interval 2 times larger than the interval of a period, which is correct right?

but if I integrate from 0 to T I will get a different result

do you mean by "the same result" that the answer to a question that wants an inner product can include any interval of integration no matter what the final arithmetic result will be?

thanks in advance

Product of periodic function is still periodic and any integration over integer multiple of period, once or twice should give the same result, or you are doing the integration wrong.

If this helps, try this identity:
\cos a \cos b = \frac{\cos (a+b) + \cos(a-b)}{2}
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top